Discrimination of personally significant from nonsignificant sounds: A training study
- 332 Downloads
Discriminating personally significant from nonsignificant sounds is of high behavioral relevance and appears to be performed effortlessly outside of the focus of attention. Although there is no doubt that we automatically monitor our auditory environment for unexpected, and hence potentially significant, events, the characteristics of detection mechanisms based on individual memory schemata have been far less explored. The experiments in the present study were designed to measure event-related potentials (ERPs) sensitive to the discrimination of personally significant and nonsignificant nonlinguistic sounds. Participants were presented with random sequences of acoustically variable sounds, one of which was associated with personal significance for each of the participants. In Experiment 1, each participant’s own mobile SMS ringtone served as his or her significant sound. In Experiment 2, a nonsignificant sound was instead trained to become personally significant to each participant over a period of one month. ERPs revealed differential processing of personally significant and nonsignificant sounds from about 200 ms after stimulus onset, even when the sounds were task-irrelevant. We propose the existence of a mechanism for the detection of significant sounds that does not rely on the detection of acoustic deviation. From a comparison of the results from our active- and passive-listening conditions, this discriminative process based on individual memory schemata seems to be obligatory, whereas the impact of individual memory schemata on further stages of auditory processing may require top-down guidance.
KeywordsNovelty Deviance detection Significance Familiarity Auditory processing ERP MMN
A.R.’s work was supported by a PhD fellowship from the Evangelisches Studienwerk e.V. Villigst. E.S.’s work was supported by a DFG-Reinhart-Koselleck project. We are grateful to Martin Reiche for his help in data collection, and thank the anonymous reviewers, who gave helpful comments on this article and on previous versions of the manuscript.
- Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132, 512–529. doi: 10.1037/0096-3422.214.171.1242 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mittermeier, V., Leicht, G., Karch, S., Hegerl, U., Möller, H. J., Pogarell, O., & Mulert, C. (2011). Attention to emotion: Auditory-evoked potentials in an emotional choice reaction task and personality traits as assessed by the NEO FFI. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 261, 111–120. doi: 10.1007/s00406-010-0127-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., & Winkler, I. (2011). Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology, 48, 4–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01114.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Öhman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 443–472). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ousdal, O. T., Jensen, J., Server, A., Hariri, A. R., Nakstad, P. H., & Andreassen, O. A. (2008). The human amygdala is involved in general behavioral relevance detection: Evidence from an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging Go–NoGo task. Neuroscience, 156, 450–455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.066 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perrin, F., Schnakers, C., Schabus, M., Degueldre, C., Goldman, S., Brédart, S., & Laureys, S. (2006). Brain response to one’s own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Archives of Neurology, 63, 562–569. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.4.562 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar