Selection history in context: Evidence for the role of reinforcement learning in biasing attention
- 168 Downloads
Attention is biased towards learned predictors of reward. The influence of reward history on attentional capture has been shown to be context-specific: When particular stimulus features are associated with reward, these features only capture attention when viewed in the context in which they were rewarded. Selection history can also bias attention, such that prior target features gain priority independently of reward history. The contextual specificity of this influence of selection history on attention has not been examined. In the present study, we demonstrate that the consequences of repetitive selection on attention robustly generalize across context, such that prior target features capture attention even in contexts in which they were never seen previously. Our findings suggest that the learning underlying attention driven by outcome-independent selection history differs qualitatively from the learning underlying value-driven attention, consistent with a distinction between associative and reinforcement learning mechanisms.
KeywordsSelective attention Attentional capture Selection history Contextual cuing Associative learning
- Anderson, B. A., & Britton, M. K. (2019). On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli. Emotion.Google Scholar
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.Google Scholar
- Kyllingsbaek, S., Van Lommel, S., Sorensen, T. A., & Bundesen, C. (2014). Automatic attraction of visual attention by supraletter features of former target strings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:1383, 1-7.Google Scholar
- Lin, Z., Lu, Z.-H., & He, S. (2016). Decomposing experience-driven attention: opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 2185-2198.Google Scholar