Control used and control felt: Two sides of the agency coin
- 128 Downloads
Agency has been defined as the sense of ownership and control of our actions, and the metacognition of agency has now been examined in a number of studies. Here we examined the relations between task demands, the feeling of being in control, and the feeling of using control. As task demands increase, we might feel as if we use a lot of control while feeling little control over the task. It therefore seems possible that the amount of control one feels they have used and how much in control one feels are separable components of the metacognition of control. In two experiments, we manipulated task demands and assessed these two aspects of metacognition. The source of task demand differed for the two experiments. In Experiment 1, we manipulated task demands by varying the sizes of targets in an aiming task. As predicted, we found that reports of control used increased, while reports of control felt decreased, for more difficult aiming conditions. In Experiment 2, we found a similar relation using a different source of demand: response conflict. We connect these reports of control to previous investigations of task demand and agency, as well as prominent conceptions of cognitive control.
KeywordsAgency Metacognition Control Aiming Conflict
We thank Matti Vuorre, Stephen Agauas, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful suggestions on the manuscript. We also thank guest editors Joo-Hyun Song and Tim Welsh for organizing this special issue of Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. Finally, we thank Sophie Paolizzi, Lisa Stevenson, Nancy Dennis, Bob Sainburg, and Brad Wyble for illuminating discussions.
Open Practices Statement
The data and supplemental material for these experiments are available via Open Science Framework at: https://osf.io/q263x/?view_only=a11b00d98ee54cea946ad02968c73db9
Neither of the experiments was preregistered.
Both authors contributed to designing the study, analyzing the data, and writing the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Declaration of Conflicting interests
The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship and publication of this article.
- Augustyn, J. S., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2005). Metacognitive control of action: Preparation for aiming reflects knowledge of Fitts’s law. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 911-916.Google Scholar
- Damen, T. G., Dijksterhuis, A., & Baaren, R. B. V. (2014a). On the other hand: nondominant hand use increases sense of agency. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), 680-683.Google Scholar
- Damen, T. G., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014b). You should read this! Perceiving and acting upon action primes influences one's sense of agency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 21-26.Google Scholar
- Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2015). Conflicts as aversive signals for control adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 255-260.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D., Hansen, S., Grierson, L. E., Lyons, J., Bennett, S. J., & Hayes, S. J. (2010). Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1023.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 342.Google Scholar
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.Google Scholar
- Erikson, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.Google Scholar
- Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381.Google Scholar
- Kirsch, W., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2016). Spatial action-effect binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 133-142.Google Scholar
- Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665.Google Scholar
- Metcalfe, J., & Greene, M. J. (2007). Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 184.Google Scholar
- Metcalfe, J., Van Snellenberg, J. X., DeRosse, P., Balsam, P., & Malhotra, A. K. (2012). Judgements of agency in schizophrenia: an impairment in autonoetic metacognition. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 1391-1400.Google Scholar
- Minohara, R., Wen, W., Hamasaki, S., Maeda, T., Kato, M., Yamakawa, H., ... & Asama, H. (2016). Strength of intentional effort enhances the sense of agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1165.Google Scholar
- Morsella, E., Wilson, L. E., Berger, C. C., Honhongva, M., Gazzaley, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). Subjective aspects of cognitive control at different stages of processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(8), 1807-1824.Google Scholar
- Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 195-206.Google Scholar
- Potts, C. A., Pastel, S., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2018). How are cognitive and physical difficulty compared?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(2), 500-511.Google Scholar
- Resnicow, J. E., Salovey, P., & Repp, B. H. (2004). Is recognition of emotion in music performance an aspect of emotional intelligence?. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 145-158.Google Scholar
- Sidarus, N., Vuorre, M., & Haggard, P. (2017). Integrating prospective and retrospective cues to the sense of agency: a multi-study investigation. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2017a(1).Google Scholar
- Stevenson, L. M., & Carlson, R. A. (2018). Consistency, not speed: temporal regularity as a metacognitive cue. Psychological Research, 1-11.Google Scholar
- van der Wel, R. P. R. D., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Cues to agency: Time can tell. Agency and Joint Attention, 54, 256.Google Scholar
- von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37(20), 464-476.Google Scholar
- Woodworth, R. S. (1899). Accuracy of voluntary movement. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 3(3), i.Google Scholar