Depth benefits now loading: Visual working memory capacity and benefits in 3-D
The present studies explored how performance in multidimensional displays varies as a function of visual working memory load, item distribution across depths, and individual capacity differences. In Experiment 1, the benefit of depth information (one depth vs. two depths) was examined across seven set sizes within a change-detection paradigm. Multiple depth planes engendered performance benefits with five items, but elicited performance decrements with three items. These effects were associated with working memory capacity, such that benefits were only observed when the working memory load exceeded an individual’s max capacity. Experiment 2 evaluated how the distribution of items in depth aids working memory performance. Equal distribution of items across depths produced higher accuracy compared with when the target was isolated in depth. Lastly, Experiment 3 explored how differences in working memory capacity affect an individual’s ability to use depth information to improve their performance. The results indicate that both low-capacity and high-capacity individuals can benefit from depth information, but this may vary as a function of working memory load. Overall, the results indicate that multidimensional displays can improve performance with sufficient working memory load, possibly through some sort of depth tag.
KeywordsVisual working memory Visual short-term memory 3-D Capacity
- Donnelly, N., Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Liversedge, S. P., Cave, K. R., & Holliman, N. S. (2017). Adding depth to overlapping displays can improve visual search performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 43(8), 1532–1549.Google Scholar
- Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. P. O. Martin (Ed.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Haladjian, H. H., Montemayor, C., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2008). Segregating targets and nontargets in depth eliminates inhibition of nontargets in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 16(1), 107–110.Google Scholar
- van Lamsweerde, A. E., & Beck, M. R. (2015). Incidental learning of probability information is differentially affected by the type of visual working memory representation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 69(4), 283–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar