Advertisement

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 275–291 | Cite as

Expectation, information processing, and subjective duration

  • Rhimmon Simchy-Gross
  • Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis
Article

Abstract

In research on psychological time, it is important to examine the subjective duration of entire stimulus sequences, such as those produced by music (Teki, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 2016). Yet research on the temporal oddball illusion (according to which oddball stimuli seem longer than standard stimuli of the same duration) has examined only the subjective duration of single events contained within sequences, not the subjective duration of sequences themselves. Does the finding that oddballs seem longer than standards translate to entire sequences, such that entire sequences that contain oddballs seem longer than those that do not? Is this potential translation influenced by the mode of information processing—whether people are engaged in direct or indirect temporal processing? Two experiments aimed to answer both questions using different manipulations of information processing. In both experiments, musical sequences either did or did not contain oddballs (auditory sliding tones). To manipulate information processing, we varied the task (Experiment 1), the sequence event structure (Experiments 1 and 2), and the sequence familiarity (Experiment 2) independently within subjects. Overall, in both experiments, the sequences that contained oddballs seemed shorter than those that did not when people were engaged in direct temporal processing, but longer when people were engaged in indirect temporal processing. These findings support the dual-process contingency model of time estimation (Zakay, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 656–664, 1993). Theoretical implications for attention-based and memory-based models of time estimation, the pacemaker accumulator and coding efficiency hypotheses of time perception, and dynamic attending theory are discussed.

Keywords

Attention and memory Temporal Processing Music cognition Sound recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Meghan Clayards, Mari Riess Jones, and three anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper, and Douglas Behrend, William Levine, and Nathan Parks for insightful and constructive feedback at earlier stages of this research.

References

  1. Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., & Antes, J. R. (1975). Effects of stimulus familiarity upon judged visual duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 17, 253–262.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., & Singmann, H. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, 2014. R package version, 1. Google Scholar
  5. Bharucha, J. J. (1987). Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist framework. Music Perception, 5, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.2307/40285384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2014). Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: Does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball illusion? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 814–828.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0602-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Block, R. A. (1989). Experiencing and remembering time: Affordances, context, and cognition. Advances in Psychology, 59, 333–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61046-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 184–197.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209393
  9. Block, R. A., George, E. J., & Reed, M. A. (1980). A watched pot sometimes boils: A study of duration experience. Acta Psychologica, 46, 81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(80)90001-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boltz, M. G. (1998). The processing of temporal and nontemporal information in the remembering of event durations and musical structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1087.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1087 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 38, 115–124.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, S. W., & Boltz, M. G. (2002). Attentional processes in time perception: Effects of mental workload and event structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 600.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.600 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cai, M. B., Eagleman, D. M., & Ma, W. J. (2015). Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation. Journal of Vision, 15(13), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1167/15.13.19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (2008). Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 137–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Debener, S., Kranczioch, C., Herrmann, C. S., & Engel, A. K. (2002). Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00072-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., & Rivière, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752–758.  https://doi.org/10.1038/89551 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2010). Time-series regression and generalized least squares in R, an Appendix to An R Companion to Applied Regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Sage. Available: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/appendix/Appendix-Timeseries-Regression.pdf
  19. Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000245 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19, 893–906.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.893 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grondin, S. (2008). Methods for studying psychological time. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of Time (pp. 51–74). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  22. Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 561–582.  https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grondin, S., & Killeen, P. R. (2009). Tracking time with song and count: Different Weber functions for musicians and nonmusicians. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1649–1654.  https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halpern, A. R. (1988a). Mental scanning in auditory imagery for songs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 434.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.434 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Halpern, A. R. (1988b). Perceived and imagined tempos of familiar songs. Music Perception, 6, 193–202.  https://doi.org/10.2307/40285425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halpern, A. R., & Zatorre, R. J. (1999). When that tune runs through your head: A PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 697–704.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.7.697 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hornstein, A. D., & Rotter, G. S. (1969). Research methodology in temporal perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 561.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026870 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Huettel, S. A., Mack, P. B., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: Dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 485–490.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn841 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huron, D. B., & Margulis, E. H. (2010). Musical expectancy and thrills. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 575–604). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230143.003.0021 Google Scholar
  30. Janata, P., & Paroo, K. (2006). Acuity of auditory images in pitch and time. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 68, 829–844.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarvis, B. G. (2014). DirectRT (Version 2014.1.127). New York: Empirisoft Corporation.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Kowal, K. H. (1987). Apparent duration and numerosity as a function of melodic familiarity. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 122−131.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lejeune, H., & Wearden, J. H. (2009). Vierordt’s The experimental study of the time sense (1868) and its legacy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 941–960.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802453006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Levitin, D. J., & Cook, P. R. (1996). Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 927–935.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis, P. A., & Miall, R. C. (2009). The precision of temporal judgement: Milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1897–1905.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0020 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Margulis, E. H. (2005). A model of melodic expectation. Music Perception, 22, 663–714.  https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.22.4.663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Margulis, E. H. (2014). On repeat: How music plays the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Matthews, W. J., & Gheorghiu, A. I. (2016). Repetition, expectation, and the perception of time. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 110–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 865–907.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McAuley, J. D., & Fromboluti, E. K. (2014). Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0401
  44. Miller, D. T. (1978). Locus of control and the ability to tolerate gratification delay: When it is better to be an external. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 49–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(78)90082-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. Google Scholar
  46. Orelien, J. G., & Edwards, L. J. (2008). Fixed-effect variable selection in linear mixed models using R2 statistics. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 1896–1907.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ornstein, R. E. (1969). On the experience of time. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2007). The effect of predictability on subjective duration. PLOS ONE, 2(11), e1264.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001264 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2012). Subjective duration distortions mirror neural repetition suppression. PLOS ONE, 7(12), e49362.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049362 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Pöppel, E. (1997). A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01008-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Poynter, W. D. (1989). Judging the duration of time intervals: A process of remembering segments of experience. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 305–331). Amsterdam: North-Holland.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61045-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/
  53. Rammsayer, T. H., & Troche, S. J. (2014). In search of the internal structure of the processes underlying interval timing in the sub-second and the second range: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Acta Psychologica, 147, 68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.00 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Regnault, P., Bigand, E., & Besson, M. (2001). Different brain mechanisms mediate sensitivity to sensory consonance and harmonic context: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 241–255.  https://doi.org/10.1162/089892901564298 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosner, B. (1983). Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics, 25, 165–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1983.1048784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schiffman, H. R., & Bobko, D. J. (1977). The role of number and familiarity of stimuli in the perception of brief temporal intervals. The American Journal of Psychology, 90, 85–93.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1421643 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmithorst, V. J., & Holland, S. K. (2003). The effect of musical training on music processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 348, 65–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00714-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Summerfield, C., & de Lange, F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 745–756.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3838 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Teki, S. (2016). A citation-based analysis and review of significant papers on timing and time perception. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00330
  61. Teki, S., Grube, M., & Griffiths, T. D. (2011). A unified model of time perception accounts for duration-based and beat-based timing mechanisms. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 5.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00090
  62. Teki, S., Grube, M., Kumar, S., & Griffiths, T. D. (2011). Distinct neural substrates of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3805–3812.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5561-10.2011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomas, E. A. C., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 17, 363–367.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomas, E. C., & Brown, I. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 16, 449–458.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 66, 1171–1189.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turvey, M. (1977) Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological physiology (pp. 211–265). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Weber, R. J., & Brown, S. (1986). Musical imagery. Music Perception, 3, 411–426.  https://doi.org/10.2307/40285346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 365–397). Amsterdam: North-Holland.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61047-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zakay, D. (1993). Relative and absolute duration judgments under prospective and retrospective paradigms. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 656–664.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1995). An attentional gate model of prospective time estimation. In M. Richelle, V. D. Keyser, G. d'Ydewalle, & A. Vandierendonck (Eds.), Time and the dynamic control of behavior (pp. 167–178). Liège: Université de Liège.Google Scholar
  71. Zakay, D., Tsal, Y., Moses, M., & Shahar, I. (1994). The role of segmentation in prospective and retrospective time estimation processes. Memory & Cognition, 22, 344–351.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 575–588.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.575 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Ziv, N., & Omer, E. (2010). Music and time: The effect of experimental paradigm, musical structure and subjective evaluations on time estimation. Psychology of Music, 39, 182–195.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610372612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rhimmon Simchy-Gross
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychological ScienceUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of MusicUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations