Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 390–401 | Cite as

Media multitasking and behavioral measures of sustained attention

  • Brandon C. W. RalphEmail author
  • David R. Thomson
  • Paul Seli
  • Jonathan S. A. Carriere
  • Daniel Smilek


In a series of four studies, self-reported media multitasking (using the media multitasking index; MMI) and general sustained-attention ability, through performance on three sustained-attention tasks: the metronome response task (MRT), the sustained-attention-to-response task (SART), and a vigilance task (here, a modified version of the SART). In Study 1, we found that higher reports of media multitasking were associated with increased response variability (i.e., poor performance) on the MRT. However, in Study 2, no association between reported media multitasking and performance on the SART was observed. These findings were replicated in Studies 3a and 3b, in which we again assessed the relation between media multitasking and performance on both the MRT and SART in two large online samples. Finally, in Study 4, using a large online sample, we tested whether media multitasking was associated with performance on a vigilance task. Although standard vigilance decrements were observed in both sensitivity (A') and response times, media multitasking was not associated with the size of these decrements, nor was media multitasking associated with overall performance, in terms of either sensitivity or response times. Taken together, the results of the studies reported here failed to demonstrate a relation between habitual engagement in media multitasking in everyday life and a general deficit in sustained-attention processes.


Attention Cognitive and attentional control 


  1. Alzahabi, R., & Becker, M. W. (2013). The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1485–1495. doi: 10.1037/a0031208 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Perception, 40, 1183–1192. doi: 10.1068/p7017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carriere, J. S. A., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 19–31. doi: 10.1037/a0031438 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, L., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2013). Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 82, 35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheyne, J. A., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2006). Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 578–592. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Giambra, L. M. (1989). Task-unrelated-thought frequency as a function of age: A laboratory study. Psychology and Aging, 4, 136–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Giambra, L. M. (1995). A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 1–21. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hancock, P. A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. American Psychologist, 68, 97–109. doi: 10.1037/a0030214 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Helton, W. S., & Russell, P. N. (2012). Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused. Experimental Brain Research, 219, 37–46. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3065-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Performance reactivity in a continuous-performance task: Implications for understanding post-error behavior. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1468–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mackworth, J. F. (1964). Performance decrement in vigilance, threshold, and high-speed perceptual motor tasks. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 209–223. doi: 10.1037/h0083302 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mackworth, N. H. (1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 6–21. doi: 10.1080/17470214808416738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackworth, N. H. (1950). Researches on the measurement of human performance (Medical Research Council, Special Report No. 268). London: Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
  14. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. McCormack, P. D. (1958). Performance in a vigilance task as a function of length of inter-stimulus interval and interpolated rest. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 12, 242–246. doi: 10.1037/h0083749 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “d’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 525–549. doi: 10.1037/a0025896 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McVay, J. C., Meier, M. E., Touron, D. R., & Kane, M. J. (2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142, 136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Minear, M., Brasher, F., McCurdy, M., Lewis, J., & Younggren, A. (2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1274–1281. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15583–15587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgement and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.Google Scholar
  21. Ralph, B. C. W., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2014). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research, 78, 661–669. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generations M 2 : Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds (Technical Report). Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: Comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Seli, P., Carriere, J. S. A., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., Ehgoetz Martens, K. A., & Smilek, D. (2014). Restless mind, restless body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 660–668. doi: 10.1037/a0035260 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., Barton, K. R., & Smilek, D. (2012a). Consistency of sustained attention across modalities: Comparing visual and auditory versions of the SART. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 44–50. doi: 10.1037/a0025111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2012b). Attention failures versus misplaced diligence: Separating attention lapses from speed–accuracy trade-offs. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 277–291. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013a). Wandering minds and wavering rhythms: Linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1–5. doi: 10.1037/a0030954 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013b). Enhanced SART validity by statistically controlling speed–accuracy trade-offs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00265 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Solman, G. J. F., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013c). A methodological note on evaluating performance in a sustained-attention-to-response task. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 355–363. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0266-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Smallwood, J., Beach, E., Schooler, J. W., & Handy, T. C. (2008). Going AWOL in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 458–469. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S. A., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Failures of sustained attention in life, lab, and brain: Ecological validity of the SART. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2564–2570. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon C. W. Ralph
    • 1
    Email author
  • David R. Thomson
    • 1
  • Paul Seli
    • 1
  • Jonathan S. A. Carriere
    • 1
  • Daniel Smilek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations