Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A two-stage search of visual working memory: investigating speed in the change-detection paradigm

Abstract

A popular procedure for investigating working memory processes has been the visual change-detection procedure. Models of performance based on that procedure, however, tend to be based on performance accuracy and treat working memory search as a one-step process, in which memory representations are compared to a test probe to determine if a match is present. To gain a clearer understanding of how search of these representations operate in the change-detection task, we examined reaction time in two experiments, with a single-item probe either located centrally or at the location of an array item. Contrary to current models of visual working memory capacity, our data point to a two-stage search process: a fast first step to check for the novelty of the probe and, in the absence of such novelty, a second, slower step to search exhaustively for a match between the test probe and a memory representation. In addition to these results, we found that participants tended not to use location information provided by the probe that theoretically could have abbreviated the search process. We suggest some basic revisions of current models of processing in this type of visual working memory task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Anderson, D. E., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2011). Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1128–1138.

  2. Allen, R., Hitch, G. J., Mate, J., & Baddeley, A. (2012). Feature binding and attention in working memory: A resolution of previous contradictory findings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 1–15.

  3. Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 160–166.

  4. Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851–854.

  5. Chen, Z., & Cowan, N. (in press). Working memory inefficiency: Minimal information is utilized in visual recognition tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.

  6. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.

  7. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.

  8. Cowan, N., AuBuchon, A. M., Gilchrist, A. L., Ricker, T. J., & Saults, J. S. (2011). Age differences in visual working memory: Not based on encoding limitations. Developmental Science, 14, 1066–1074.

  9. Cowan, N., Blume, C. L., & Saults, J. S. (2013). Attention to attributes and objects in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 731–747.

  10. Donkin, C., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2012). The structure of short-term memory scanning: An investigation using response time distribution models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 363–394.

  11. Donkin, C., Nosofsky, R. M., Gold, J. M., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2013). Discrete-slots models of visual working memory response times. Psychological Review, 120, 873–902.

  12. Gorgoraptis, N., Catalao, R. F. G., Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2011). Dynamic updating of working memory resources for visual objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8502–8511.

  13. Hyun, J., Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1140–1160.

  14. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.

  15. May, C. P., Hasher, L., & Kane, M. J. (1999). The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition, 27, 767.

  16. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.

  17. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.

  18. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.

  19. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Cowan, N., Zwilling, C. E., Morey, C. C., & Pratte, M. S. (2008). An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 5975–5979.

  20. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2011). How to measure working-memory capacity in the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 324–330.

  21. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.

  22. Thiele, J. E., Pratte, M. S., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). On perfect working memory performance with large numbers of items. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 958–963.

  23. Townsend, J. T. (1976). Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 219–238.

  24. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46–54.

  25. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237.

  26. Treisman, A., & Zhang, W. (2006). Location and binding in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1704–1719.

  27. Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64.

  28. Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Flexibility in visual working memory: Accurate change detection in the face of irrelevant variations in position. Visual Cognition, 20, 1–28.

  29. Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235.

  30. Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The number and quality of representations in working memory. Psychological Science, 22, 1434–1441.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NIH Grant R01 HD-21338 to Cowan and NIA Training Grant T32 AG000175-21 (Georgia Institute of Technology). We wish to thank Scott Saults for assistance with programming. Address correspondence to Amanda Gilchrist, Department of Psychology, Cottey College, Nevada, MO 64772, USA, or to Nelson Cowan, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. E-mail: agilchrist@cottey.edu or CowanN@missouri.edu.

Author information

Correspondence to Amanda L. Gilchrist.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 7 Unweighted RT means and standard errors (in ms) for effects and interactions not included in figures in Experiment 1. Significant effects and interactions are marked with an asterisk. Four-way interactions have been omitted for sake of simplicity

Appendix 2

Table 8 Unweighted means and standard errors for RT effects and interactions (in ms) not included in figures in Experiment 2. Significant effects and interactions are marked with an asterisk. Four- and five-way interactions have been omitted for sake of simplicity

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilchrist, A.L., Cowan, N. A two-stage search of visual working memory: investigating speed in the change-detection paradigm. Atten Percept Psychophys 76, 2031–2050 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0704-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Visual working memory
  • Memory search
  • Change-detection
  • Reaction time