Advertisement

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 649–654 | Cite as

Onsets do not override top-down goals, but they are responded to more quickly

  • Shu-Chieh Wu
  • Roger W. Remington
  • Charles L. Folk
Article

Abstract

Do onsets automatically capture attention? Spatial-cuing experiments often reveal no capture by onset cues in searches for color targets. However, recent experiments have shown faster responses to an uncued color target presented as an abrupt onset than as a change to an existing item, which has been argued to reflect capture by the onset. In the present experiment, we tested whether this onset advantage reflects the capture of attention or processing independent of shifts of attention. In a modified spatial-cuing paradigm, noninformative color precues were paired with color targets presented as abrupt onsets or as no-onset characters. Critically, the number of other onset items in the target display was manipulated, which has previously been shown to disrupt attention allocation to any particular item. It was reasoned that if the onset advantage for uncued color targets reflects attentional capture, then the appearance of additional onsets should eliminate this advantage. The results showed that even with multiple onsets on the target display, the onset advantage remained additive with cue validity. The additive effects are inconsistent with automatic capture by onsets, suggesting instead that the onset advantage arises from an independent source.

Keywords

Attentional capture Visual search Selective attention 

Notes

Author note

R.W.R. and C.L.F. were supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant No. DP120103721. Portions of this article were presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, Washington, November 2011. We thank Alexandra Shelley for her assistance in recruiting and testing participants, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891–900. doi: 10.3758/BF03194445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1231–1242. doi: 10.3758/BF03194848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wu, S.-C. (2009). Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 308–313. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Krumhansl, C. L. (1982). Abrupt changes in visual stimulation enhance processing of form and location information. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 511–523. doi: 10.3758/BF03204204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Schreij, D., Los, S. A., Theeuwes, J., Enns, J. T., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal-driven orienting as revealed by eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 378–390. doi: 10.1037/a0034574 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 208–218. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.2.208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2010). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 672–682. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799–806. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Todd, J. T., & Van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a transient–sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 625–638. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.625 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.90 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 180–186. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00033-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wright, R. D., & Richard, C. M. (2003). Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 925–938. doi: 10.3758/BF03194824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu, S.-C., & Remington, R. W. (2003). Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1050–1067. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1050 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yantis, S., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812–825. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.812 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.601 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shu-Chieh Wu
    • 1
  • Roger W. Remington
    • 2
  • Charles L. Folk
    • 3
  1. 1.San Jose State University and NASA Ames Research Center Mail Stop 262-4Moffett FieldUSA
  2. 2.The University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.Villanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations