Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 148–161 | Cite as

Responding to the direction of the eyes: In search of the masked gaze-cueing effect

  • Shahd Al-JanabiEmail author
  • Matthew Finkbeiner


Recent studies have demonstrated that masked gaze cues can produce a cueing effect. Those studies, however, all utilized a localization task and, hence, are ambiguous with respect to whether the previously observed masked gaze-cueing effect reflects the orienting of attention or the preparation of a motor response. The aim of the present study was to investigate this issue by determining whether masked gaze cues can modulate responses in detection and discrimination tasks, both of which isolate spatial attention from response priming. First, we found a gaze-cueing effect for unmasked cues in detection, discrimination, and localization tasks, which suggests that the gaze-cueing effect for visible cues is not task dependent. Second, and in contrast, we found a gaze-cueing effect for masked cues in a localization task, but not in detection or discrimination tasks, which suggests that the gaze-cueing effect for masked cues is task dependent. Therefore, the present study shows that the masked gaze-cueing effect is attributed to response priming, as opposed to the orienting of spatial attention.


Visual attention Eye gaze Masking Attentional shifts Response priming 


Author note

We are grateful to Lucy Shi, Anthony Espinosa, and Mohammed Rafat for collecting the Experiment 4 data. This work was supported in part by an Australian Research Fellowship to M.F. from the Australian Research Council (DP0880806, FT120100830).


  1. Abrams, R. L., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Janabi, S., & Finkbeiner, M. (2012). Effective processing of masked eye gaze requires volitional control. Experimental Brain Research, 216, 433–443. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2944-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando, S. (2002). Luminance-induced shift in the apparent direction of gaze. Perception, 31, 657–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ando, S. (2004). Perception of gaze direction based on luminance ratio. Perception, 33, 1173–1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Worschech, F. (2010). Attentional capture by masked color singletons. Vision Research, 50, 2015–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 648–653. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762–777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayliss, A. P., Bartlett, J., Naughtin, C. K., & Kritikos, A. (2011). A direct link between gaze perception and social attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 634–644. doi: 10.1037/a0020559 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brignani, D., Guzzon, D., Marzi, C. A., & Miniussi, C. (2009). Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue. Neuropsychologia, 47, 370–381. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calder, A. J., Beaver, J. D., Winston, J. S., Dolan, R. J., Jenkins, R., Eger, E., & Henson, R. N. (2007). Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule. Current Biology, 17, 20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.052 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Damian, M. F. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: Automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514–520. doi: 10.3758/BF03196307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What’s new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345–352. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01520-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495. doi: 10.3758/BF03208827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friesen, C. K., Moore, C., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention? Brain and Cognition, 57, 66–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friesen, C. K., Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 319–329. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.319 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuchs, I., & Ansorge, U. (2012). Inhibition of return is no hallmark of exogenous capture by unconscious cues. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(30), 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00030 Google Scholar
  20. Fuchs, I., Theeuwes, J., & Ansorge, U. (2013). Exogenous attentional capture by subliminal abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from contrast-polarity independent cueing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 947–988.Google Scholar
  21. Galfano, G., Dalmaso, M., Marzoli, D., Pavan, G., Coricelli, C., & Castelli, L. (2012). Eyes cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1895–1910. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.663765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffmann, E. A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hooker, C. I. L., Paller, K. A., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M. M., & Reber, P. J. (2003). Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 406–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopf, J. M., Vogel, E., Woodman, G., Heinze, H. J., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2088–2095.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science, 9, 441–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Main, J. C., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Feinberg, D. R., & Tiddeman, B. P. (2010). Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 617–624. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1575 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langton, S. R. H., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive social orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu, S., Cai, Y., Shen, M., Zhou, Y., & Han, S. (2012). Alerting and orienting of attention without visual awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 928–938. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., & Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 887–904. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.887 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Materna, S., Dicke, P. W., & Their, P. (2008). Dissociable roles of the superior temporal sulcus and the intraparietal sulcus in joint attention: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 108–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15, 779–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to non-reportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nobre, A. C., Sebestyen, G. N., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using postitron emisssion tomography. Brain, 120, 515–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nummenmaa, L., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 135–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
  38. Reuss, H., Pohl, C., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2011). Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82–91. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ristic, J., Landry, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Automated symbolic orienting: The missing link. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(560), 1–7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00560 Google Scholar
  40. Rombough, A. H., Barrie, J. N., & Iarocci, G. (2012). Social cueing elicits a distinct form of visual spatial orienting: Evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and developmental research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 682–689. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sato, W., Okada, T., & Toichi, M. (2007). Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 87–94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1025-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 586–598.Google Scholar
  44. Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1005–1030. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.1005 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Van den Bussche, E., Segers, G., & Reynvoet, B. (2008). Conscious and unconscious proportion effects in masked priming. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1345–1358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, J. H. (2010). Salience from the decision perspective: You know where it is before you know it is there. Journal of Vision, 10(14), 1–16. doi: 10.1167/10.14.35 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, Z. J., Zhao, Y. J., & Zhan, Q. T. (2011). Effects of gaze direction perception on gaze following behaviour. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 726–738.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive Science and ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its DisordersMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations