Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 88–94 | Cite as

The interpretation of ambiguous trimorphemic words in sentence context

  • Alexander Pollatsek
  • Denis Drieghe
  • Linnaea Stockall
  • Roberto G. de Almeida
Brief Reports
  • 967 Downloads

Abstract

Many trimorphemic words are structurally and semantically ambiguous. For example, unlock-able can either be un-lockable (cannot be locked) or unlock-able (can be unlocked). Which interpretation is preferred and whether the preceding sentence context affects the initial interpretation is not clear from prior research. The present experiment embedded ambiguous trimorphemic words in sentence contexts, manipulated whether or not preceding context disambiguated the meaning, and examined the pattern of fixation durations on the ambiguous word and the remainder of the text. The results indicated that the unlock-able interpretation was preferred; moreover, preceding context did not exert a significant effect until the eyes had initially exited from the target word.

Keywords

Target Word Ambiguous Word Sentence Context Preceding Context Prior Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baayen, R. H. (2007). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair, I. V., Urland, G. R., & Ma, J. E. (2002). Using Internet search engines to estimate word frequency. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 34, 286- 290.Google Scholar
  4. de Almeida, R. G., & Libben, G. (2005). Changing morphological structures: The effect of sentence context on the interpretation of structurally ambiguous English trimorphemic words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1612–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Libben, G. (2003). Morphological parsing and morphological structure. In A. Egbert & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 221–239). Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Libben, G. (2006). Getting at psychological reality: On- and off-line tasks in the investigation of hierarchical morphological structure. In G. Wiebe, G. Libben, T. Priestly, R. Smyth, & H. S. Wang (Eds.), Phonology, morphology, and the empirical imperative: Papers in honour of Bruce L. Derwing (pp. 235–255). Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 685–702.Google Scholar
  10. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 820–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191–201.Google Scholar
  12. Taft, M. (1988). A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation. Linguistics, 26, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Pollatsek
    • 1
  • Denis Drieghe
    • 2
  • Linnaea Stockall
    • 3
  • Roberto G. de Almeida
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations