Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 888–892 | Cite as

What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning?

Brief Reports

Abstract

Two picture—word interference experiments were conducted to investigate the nature of effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word production. The names of the pictures were Cantonese monosyllables with a consonant 1 vowel 1 consonant (CVC) structure. Participants’ picture-naming responses were faster when the target (e.g., “star” /sing1/) and the distractor shared the same CVC component (e.g., /sing4/, meaning “city”), the same CV component (e.g., /sik6/, “eat”), or the same VC component (e.g., /ging2/, “region”), as opposed to when they were unrelated, and the facilitation effects observed were comparable in size. Also, similar facilitation effects were obtained across the CV1tone-related and the VC1tone-related conditions, whereas no reliable effect was found in the V1tone-related condition. These results indicate that an effective phonological unit in spoken word planning is neither a syllable (without tone) nor a segmental unit, and that the possible candidates lie between the two, at least in Cantonese.

References

  1. Bruche-Schulz, G. (1997). “Fuzzy” Chinese: The status of Cantonese in Hong Kong. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, H.-C. (1992). Reading comprehension in Chinese: Implications from character reading times. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 175–205). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, H.-C. (2006). Language processing: Implications from the study of Chinese. In Q. Jing, M. R. Rosenweig, G. d’Ydewalle, H. Zhang, H.-C. Chen, & K. Zhang (Eds.), International progress in psychological science: Neural, cognitive, and developmental issues (pp. 367–381). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, J. Y. (1999). The representation and processing of tone in Man darin Chinese: Evidence from slips of the tongue. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, J. Y., Chen, T. M., & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 751–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung, H., Chen, H.-C., Lai, C. Y., Wong, O. C., & Hills, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness: Effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81, 227–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinese character database: With word formations (2003). Retrieved on May 30, 2008, from http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/ Lexis/lexi-can/.Google Scholar
  10. Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.Google Scholar
  13. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese. A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture—word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1146–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schiller, N. O. (1998). The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 484–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schiller, N. O. (2008). The masked onset priming effect in picture naming. Cognition, 106, 952–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wong, A. W.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2008). Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1172–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu, S. Y. (2001). Modeling speech production: Implications from a Chinese study. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin N.T., Hong Kong S.A.R.China

Personalised recommendations