Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 320–327 | Cite as

Spatial negative priming in bilingualism

  • Barbara Treccani
  • Efrosyni Argyri
  • Antonella Sorace
  • Sergio Della Sala
Brief Reports


Balanced bilinguals have been shown to have an enhanced ability to inhibit distracting information. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the bilinguals’ efficiency in inhibitory control can be advantageous in some conditions, but disadvantageous in others—for example, negative priming conditions, in which previously irrelevant information becomes relevant. Data collected in a target-stimulus locating task from 29 early bilingual adults and 29 age-matched monolinguals showed that the bilinguals’ greater inhibition of irrelevant spatial information (i.e., the position of a distractor stimulus) resulted in a smaller effect of the distractor presence (i.e., a smaller difference in error rates in trials with and without distractors) and a larger negative priming effect (i.e., a larger difference between the error rates shown in trials wherein the target position corresponded to the position of the previous-trial distractor and trials wherein the target was presented in a previously vacant position). These findings support the hypothesis of specific nonlinguistic cognitive effects of bilingualism on inhibitory control functions, which are not necessarily reflected in cognitive advantages.


  1. Amieva, H., Phillips, L. H., Della Sala, S., & Henry, J. D. (2004). Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 127, 949–964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E. (2006). Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 68–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialystok, E., & Codd, J. (1997). Cardinal limits: Evidence from language awareness and bilingualism for developing concepts of number. Cognitive Development, 12, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A., & Pantev, C. (2005). Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24, 40–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology & Aging, 19, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Ruocco, A. C. (2006). Dual-modality monitoring in a classification task: The effects of bilingualism and ageing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1968–1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 6, 1341–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002). Influence of probe-trial selection on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 273–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, A., Hernandez, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 1, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, M. M., & Bialystok, E. (2003, October). The development of two kinds of inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Simon vs. Stroop. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, Park City, UT.Google Scholar
  15. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resourcelimited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
  17. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.Google Scholar
  20. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591–611.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Treccani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Efrosyni Argyri
    • 1
  • Antonella Sorace
    • 1
  • Sergio Della Sala
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Cognitive Neuroscience, PsychologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.University of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations