On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task
The processing selectivity in the flanker task has been shown to depend on the ratio of congruent trials to incongruent trials in a task (Gratton, Coles, & Donchin, 1992). If congruent trials are more frequent than incongruent ones, the flankers are more attended and, consequently, the flanker congruency effect is increased. Recent results suggest that participants can even allocate attention on the fly to the flankers—that is, in a highly flexible way after stimulus onset—depending on the frequency of incongruent trials on a certain stimulus location. Because location plays a unique role in stimulus selection, we investigated in two experiments whether selectivity can also be adjusted on the fly depending on stimulus color. The results demonstrate that color can be used for such an adjustment, but only if the association between color and frequency has been previously learned under blocked conditions
KeywordsStroop Task Incongruent Trial Stimulus Location Processing Selectivity Congruent Trial
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S.
, & Cohen, J. D.
(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review
, 624–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K.
, & McClelland, J. L.
(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review
, 332–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corballis, P. M.
, & Gratton, G.
(2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology
, 191–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z.
, & Milliken, B.
(2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, 316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, B. A.
, & Eriksen, C. W.
(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics
, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, C. W.
, & Schultz, D. W.
(1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics
, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G.
, & Donchin, E.
(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
, 480–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & Lehle, C.
(2007). Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance
, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D.
, & Hessels, S.
(2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, 638–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J.
, & Williamson, J.
(1984). Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
, 135–138.Google Scholar
, & Cohen, A.
(2005). Location specificity in response selection processes for visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics
, 270–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & Squire, L. R.
(1993). Implicit learning of color-word associations using a Stroop paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition
, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & Craig, G. L.
(1997). Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task. Memory & Cognition
, 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroop, J. R.
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology
, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H.
, & Sommer, W.
(2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance
, 1345–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & Lavie, N.
(1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance
, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A.
, & Berger, J.
(1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition
, 727–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M.
, & Botvinick, M. M.
(2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H.
, & Vietze, I.
(2008). Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008