Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 679–691 | Cite as

The comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences

  • J. David Smith
  • Michael J. Beran
  • Justin J. Couchman
  • Mariana V. C. Coutinho
Theoretical and Review Articles


Results that point to animals’ metacognitive capacity bear a heavy burden, given the potential for competing behavioral descriptions. In this article, formal models are used to evaluate the force of these descriptions. One example is that many existing studies have directly rewarded so-called uncertainty responses. Modeling confirms that this practice is an interpretative danger because it supports associative processes and encourages simpler interpretations. Another example is that existing studies raise the concern that animals avoid difficult stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored, but because of aversion given error-causing or reinforcementlean stimuli. Modeling also justifies this concern and shows that this problem is not addressed by the common practice of comparing performance on chosen and forced trials. The models and related discussion have utility for metacognition researchers and theorists broadly, because they specify the experimental operations that will best indicate a metacognitive capacity in humans or animals by eliminating alternative behavioral accounts.


Response Strength Subjective Impression Dense Response Perceptual Error Uncertainty Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acredolo, C., & O’Connor, J. (1991). On the difficulty of detecting cognitive uncertainty. Human Development, 34, 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., Coutinho, M. V. C., Couchman, J. J., & Boomer, J. G. (2008). The psychological organization of “uncertainty” responses and “middle” responses: A dissociation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  3. Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., & Washburn, D. A. (2006). Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 111–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive development (Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, 4th ed., pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Call, J., & Carpenter, M. (2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition, 3, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foote, A. L., & Crystal, J. D. (2007). Metacognition in the rat. Current Biology, 17, 551–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallup, G. G. (1982). Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology, 2, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hampton, R. R. (2001). Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 5359–5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inman, A., & Shettleworth, S. J. (1999). Detecting metamemory in nonverbal subjects: A test with pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kornell, N., Son, L. K., & Terrace, H. S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 64–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Metcalfe, J., & Kober, H. (2005). Self-reflective consciousness and the projectable self. In H. S. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. 57–83). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Morgan, C. L. (1906). An introduction to comparative psychology. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, T. O. (Ed.) (1992). Metacognition: Core readings. Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Proust, J. (2003). Does metacognition necessarily involve metarepresentation? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shields, W. E., Smith, J. D., Guttmannova, K., & Washburn, D. A. (2005). Confidence judgments by humans and rhesus monkeys. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 165–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shields, W. E., Smith, J. D., & Washburn, D. A. (1997). Uncertain responses by humans and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a psychophysical same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, J. D. (in press). Animal metacognition and consciousness. In A. Cleeremans, T. Bayne, & P. Wilken (Eds.), The Oxford companion to consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Redford, J. S., & Washburn, D. A. (2006). Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, J. D., & Schull, J. (2008). [Uncertainty monitoring in the rat]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, J. D., Schull, J., Strote, J., McGee, K., Egnor, R., & Erb, L. (1995). The uncertain response in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., Allendoerfer, K. R., & Washburn, D. A. (1998). Memory monitoring by animals and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., Schull, J., & Washburn, D. A. (1997). The uncertain response in humans and animals. Cognition, 62, 75–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., & Washburn, D. A. (2003). The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 317–373.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, J. D., & Washburn, D. A. (2005). Uncertainty monitoring and metacognition by animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Staddon, J. E. R., Jozefowiez, J., & Cerutti, D. (April 13, 2007). Metacognition: A problem not a process. PsyCrit, 1–5.Google Scholar
  35. Stebbins, W. C. (Ed.) (1970). Animal psychophysics: The design and conduct of sensory experiments. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  36. Suda-King, C. (2008). Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember? Animal Cognition, 11, 21–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Washburn, D. A., Smith, J. D., & Shields, W. E. (2006). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 185–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. David Smith
    • 1
  • Michael J. Beran
    • 2
  • Justin J. Couchman
    • 1
  • Mariana V. C. Coutinho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySUNY BuffaloBuffalo
  2. 2.Georgia State UniversityAtlanta

Personalised recommendations