Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 543–547 | Cite as

Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory?

  • James R. Brockmole
  • Mario A. Parra
  • Sergio Della Sala
  • Robert H. Logie
Brief Reports


Remembering visual material, such as objects, faces, and spatial locations, over a short period of time (seconds) becomes more difficult as we age. We investigated whether these deficits could be explained by a simple reduction in visual working memory capacity or by an impairment in one’s ability to form or maintain appropriate associations among pieces of related information. In three experiments, we used recognition and recall tests to address the efficacy with which older adults can create bound object representations by varying the number of features of each object that had to be remembered for a subsequent memory test. Results demonstrated that whereas older adults exhibited reduced memory capacity as compared with that of younger adults, both groups stored integrated object representations in visual working memory. These results are contrasted with other work that suggests that age-related memory decline is due, at least in part, to associative deficits.


Retention Interval Object Representation Recall Task Visual Working Memory Mixed Model ANOVA 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.) (2006). Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowan, N., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Kilb, A., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Life-span development of visual working memory: When is feature binding difficult? Developmental Psychology, 42, 1089–1102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Craik, F. I. M. (2006). Remembering items and their contexts: Effects of aging and divided attention. In H. D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Handbook of binding and memory: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 315–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gajewski, D. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2006). Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, J. S., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2008). The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Mather, M., & D’Esposito, M. (2000). Aging and reflective processes of working memory: Binding and test load deficits. Psychology & Aging, 15, 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1170–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Guez, J., Kilb, A., & Reedy, S. (2004). The associative memory deficit of older adults: Further support using face— name associations. Psychology & Aging, 19, 541–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Sylvester, C.-Y. C. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of working memory and aging. In R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, & D. Park (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral aging (pp. 186–217). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (1994). Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 241–264). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Brockmole
    • 1
  • Mario A. Parra
    • 1
  • Sergio Della Sala
    • 1
  • Robert H. Logie
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations