Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 515–520 | Cite as

Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not

  • Keith B. Lyle
  • Jessica M. Logan
  • Henry L. Roediger
Brief Reports

Abstract

Subjects who make repetitive saccadic eye movements before a memory test subsequently exhibit superior retrieval in comparison with subjects who do not move their eyes. It has been proposed that eye movements enhance retrieval by increasing interaction of the left and right cerebral hemispheres. To test this, we compared the effect of eye movements on subsequent recall (Experiment 1) and recognition (Experiment 2) in two groups thought to differ in baseline degree of hemispheric interaction—individuals who are strongly right-handed (SR) and individuals who are not (nSR). For SR subjects, who naturally may experience less hemispheric interaction than nSR subjects, eye movements enhanced retrieval. In contrast, depending on the measure, eye movements were either inconsequential or even detrimental for nSR subjects. These results partially support the hemispheric interaction account, but demand an amendment to explain the harmful effects of eye movements for nSR individuals.

References

  1. Bakan, P., & Svorad, D. (1969). Resting EEG alpha asymmetry of reflective lateral eye movements. Nature, 223, 975–976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Retrieved October, 2005, from elexicon.wustl.edu/, Washington University.Google Scholar
  3. Cabeza, R., Locantore, J. K., & Anderson, N. D. (2003). Lateralization of prefrontal activity during episodic memory retrieval: Evidence for the production-monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 249–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christman, S. D., Garvey, K. J., Propper, R. E., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2003). Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories. Neuropsychology, 17, 221–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Brown, T. J. (2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology, 20, 336–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Dion, A. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain & Cognition, 56, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowell, P. E., Kertesz, A., & Denenberg, V. H. (1993). Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosum. Neurology, 43, 2353–2357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Faust, M., Ben-Artzi, E., & Harel, I. (in press). Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: Evidence from false memories for ambiguous words. Brain & Language.Google Scholar
  9. Habib, M., Gayraud, D., Oliva, A., Regis, J., Salamon, G., & Khalil, R. (1991). Effects of handedness and sex on the morphology of the corpus callosum: A study with brain magnetic resonance imaging. Brain & Cognition, 16, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jäncke, L., & Steinmetz, H. (2003). Brain size: A possible source of interindividual variability in corpus callosum morphology. In E. Zaidel & M. Iacoboni (Eds.), The parallel brain: The cognitive neuroscience of the corpus callosum (pp. 51–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (2000). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. In D. L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 35–86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 712–718.Google Scholar
  13. Kertesz, A., Polk, M., Howell, J., & Black, S. E. (1987). Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size in MRI. Neurology, 37, 1385–1388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyle, K. B., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L., III (in press). Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: Evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tasks. Neuropsychology.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., & Greene, E. J. (2004). Prefrontal cortex activity associated with source monitoring in a working memory task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 921–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore, T., & Fallah, M. (2004). Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 152–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nolde, S. F., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). The role of the prefrontal cortex during tests of episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 399–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker, A., & Dagnall, N. (2007). Effects of bilateral eye movements on gist based false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Brain & Cognition, 63, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phelps, E. A., Hirst, W., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1991).Deficits in recall following partial and complete commissurotomy. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 492–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2004). Mixed- versus strong righthandedness is associated with biases towards “remember” versus “know” judgements in recognition memory: Role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory, 12, 707–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Propper, R. E., Christman, S. D., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2005). A mixedhanded advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition, 33, 751–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Propper, R. E., Pierce, J., Bellorado, N., Geisler, M. W., & Christman, S. D. (2007). Effect of bilateral eye movements on frontal interhemispheric gamma EEG coherence: Implications for EMDR therapy. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 195, 785–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roediger, H. L., III, Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosano, C., Krisky, C. M., Welling, J. S., Eddy, W. F., Luna, B., Thulborn, K. R., & Sweeney, J. A. (2002). Pursuit and saccadic eye movement subregions in human frontal eye field: A high-resolution fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 107–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Witelson, S. F. (1985). The brain connection: The corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science, 229, 665–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zaidel, D., & Sperry, R. W. (1974). Memory impairments after comissurotomy in man. Brain, 97, 263–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith B. Lyle
    • 3
  • Jessica M. Logan
    • 1
  • Henry L. Roediger
    • 2
  1. 1.Rice UniversityHouston
  2. 2.Washington UniversitySt. Louis
  3. 3.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of LouisvilleLouisville

Personalised recommendations