Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not
Subjects who make repetitive saccadic eye movements before a memory test subsequently exhibit superior retrieval in comparison with subjects who do not move their eyes. It has been proposed that eye movements enhance retrieval by increasing interaction of the left and right cerebral hemispheres. To test this, we compared the effect of eye movements on subsequent recall (Experiment 1) and recognition (Experiment 2) in two groups thought to differ in baseline degree of hemispheric interaction—individuals who are strongly right-handed (SR) and individuals who are not (nSR). For SR subjects, who naturally may experience less hemispheric interaction than nSR subjects, eye movements enhanced retrieval. In contrast, depending on the measure, eye movements were either inconsequential or even detrimental for nSR subjects. These results partially support the hemispheric interaction account, but demand an amendment to explain the harmful effects of eye movements for nSR individuals.
- Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Retrieved October, 2005, from elexicon.wustl.edu/, Washington University.Google Scholar
- Faust, M., Ben-Artzi, E., & Harel, I. (in press). Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: Evidence from false memories for ambiguous words. Brain & Language.Google Scholar
- Jäncke, L., & Steinmetz, H. (2003). Brain size: A possible source of interindividual variability in corpus callosum morphology. In E. Zaidel & M. Iacoboni (Eds.), The parallel brain: The cognitive neuroscience of the corpus callosum (pp. 51–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (2000). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. In D. L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 35–86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 712–718.Google Scholar
- Lyle, K. B., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L., III (in press). Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: Evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tasks. Neuropsychology.Google Scholar