Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 495–514 | Cite as

Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action

Theoretical and Review Articles


Spontaneous gestures that accompany speech are related to both verbal and spatial processes. We argue that gestures emerge from perceptual and motor simulations that underlie embodied language and mental imagery. We first review current thinking about embodied cognition, embodied language, and embodied mental imagery. We then provide evidence that gestures stem from spatial representations and mental images. We then propose the gestures-as-simulated-action framework to explain how gestures might arise from an embodied cognitive system. Finally, we compare this framework with other current models of gesture production, and we briefly outline predictions that derive from the framework.


Mental Rotation Motor Imagery Mental Image Lexical Access Speech Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adolph, K. E. (1997). Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 62, 1–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 5, 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alibali, M. W., Bassok, M., Solomon, K. D., Syc, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science, 10, 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alibali, M. W., Flevares, L. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. In R Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 349–365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar
  9. Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beattie, G., & Coughlan, J. (1998). An experimental investigation of the role of iconic gestures in lexical access using the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2002). What properties of talk are associated with the generation of spontaneous iconic hand gestures? British Journal of Psychology, 41, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Begg, I. (1972). Recall of meaningful phrases. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bertenthal, B. I., Campos, J. J., & Kermoian, R. (1994). An epigenetic perspective on the development of self-produced locomotion and its consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory & Cognition, 32, 863–873.Google Scholar
  16. Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech: When hand and mouth come together. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 235–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, A., & Rushton, J. P. (1978). Bodily communication and personality. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 17, 31–36.Google Scholar
  18. Campos, J. J., Anderson, D. I., Barbu-Roth, M. A., Hubbard, E. M., Hertenstein, M. J., & Witherington, D. (2000). Travel broadens the mind. Infancy, 1, 149–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Campos, J. J., Bertenthal, B. I., & Kermoian, R. (92). Early experience and emotional development: The emergence of wariness of heights. Psychological Science, 3, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chawla, P., & Krauss, R. M. (1994). Gesture and speech in spontaneous and rehearsed narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 580–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooper, L. A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 296–302.Google Scholar
  26. Cornoldi, C., & Vecchi, T. (2003). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  27. de Ruiter, J. P. (1998). Gesture and speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  28. de Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In D. Mc-Neill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitts’s law hold in mental imagery? Behavioural Brain Research, 72, 127–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23, 517–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Denis, M., Gonçalves, M.-R., & Memmi, D. (1995). Mental scanning of visual images generated from verbal descriptions: Towards a model of image accuracy. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1511–1530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race, and culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  36. Ejiri, K. (1998). Synchronization between preverbal vocalizations and motor actions in early infancy: I. Pre-canonical babbling vocalizations synchronize with rhythmic body movements before the onset of canonical babbling. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 68, 433–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Feyereisen, P., & Havard, I. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Frick-Horbury, D., & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ganis, G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual imagery and visual perception: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 226–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gentilucci, M., & Dalla Volta, R. (in press). Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar
  45. Gerlach, C., Law, I., & Paulson, O. B. (2002). When action turns into words: Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1230–1239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gerwing, J., & Bavelas, J. B. (2004). Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture, 4, 157–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain & Language, 84, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Berg, E. A. (2002). Mental imagery and emodied activity. Journal of Mental Imagery, 26, 1–30.Google Scholar
  50. Gibson, E. J., & Walk, R. D. (1960). The “visual cliff.” Scientific American, 202, 64–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.Google Scholar
  53. Glenberg, A. M., Havas, D., Becher, R., & Rinck, M. (2005). Grounding language in bodily states: The case for emotion. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 115–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.Google Scholar
  55. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Sandhofer, C. M. (1999). Gestures convey substantive information about a child’s thoughts to ordinary listeners. Developmental Science, 2, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Goldin-Meadow, S., Wein, D., & Chang, C. (1992). Assessing knowledge through gesture: Using children’s hands to read their minds. Cognition & Instruction, 9, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage, 6, 231–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 377–396.Google Scholar
  63. Hadar, U., Burstein, A., Krauss, R. M., & Soroker, N. (1998). Ideational gestures and speech in brain-damaged subjects. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Haueisen, J., & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 786–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Helstrup, T., & Andersen, R. E. (1991). Imagery in mental construction and decomposition tasks. In R. H. Logie & M. Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. 229–240). New York: Elsevier, North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Holler, J., & Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 26, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). On the tip of the mind: Gesture as a key to conceptualization. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 589–594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7, 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language & Cognitive Processes, 22, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hostetter, A. B., Bieda, K., Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M., & Knuth, E. J. (2006). Don’t just tell them, show them! Teachers can intentionally alter their instructional gestures. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1523–1528). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Hostetter, A. B., & Hopkins, W. D. (2002). The effect of thought structure on the production of lexical movements. Brain & Language, 82, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Iverson, J. M., & Thelen, E. (2000). Hand, mouth, and brain: The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. In R. Nuñez & W. J. Freeman (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention, and emotion (pp. 19–40). Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  76. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1419–1432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103-S109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94, B79-B89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kaschak, M. P., Zwaan, R. A., Aveyard, M., & Yaxley, R. H. (2006). Perception of auditory motion affects language processing. Cognitive Science, 30, 733–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kelly, S. D., Iverson, J. M., Terranova, J., Niego, J., Hopkins, M., & Goldsmith, L. (2002). Putting language back in the body: Speech and gesture on three time frames. Developmental Neuropsychology, 22, 323–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. Mc-Neill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 90–94.Google Scholar
  88. Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 333–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Chawla, P. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, 389–450). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  91. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Krauss, R. M., Morrel-Samuels, P., & Colasante, C. (1991). Do conversational hand gestures communicate? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, 743–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  95. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  96. Lakoff, G., & Nuñez, R. E. (2001). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  97. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  98. Markman, A. B., & Dietrich, E. (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 470–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mast, F. W., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2002). Visual mental images can be ambiguous: Insights from individual differences in transformation abilities. Cognition, 86, 57–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  101. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  102. McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. D. (2000). Growth points in thinking-forspeaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Melinger, A., & Kita, S. (2007). Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language & Cognitive Processes, 22, 473–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Melinger, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). Gesture and the communicative intention of the speaker. Gesture, 4, 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 411–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Nuñez, R. [E.] (2005). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In F. Ilda, R. P. Pfeifer, L. Steels, & Y. Kuniyoshi (Eds.), Embodied artificial intelligence (pp. 54–73). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  109. Nuñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Paivio, A. (1963). Learning of adjective-noun paired associates as a function of adjective-noun word order and noun abstractness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 370–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningulness in pairedassociate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Paivio, A. (1968). A factor-analytic study of word attributes and verbal learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  115. Paivio, A. (1975). Coding distinctions and repetition effects in memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 179–214). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  116. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.Google Scholar
  117. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Peterson, M. A., Kihlstrom, J. F., Rose, P. M., & Glisky, M. L. (1992). Mental images can be ambiguous: Reconstruals and reference-frame reversals. Memory & Cognition, 20, 107–123.Google Scholar
  119. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 253–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. J. (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 873–878). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  124. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  127. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, T. (1999). Inferences through imagined actions: Knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Shapiro, L. (2007). The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass, 2, 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  130. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teachers’ gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 129–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sperry, R W. (1952). Neurology and the mind-brain problem. American Scientist, 40, 291–312.Google Scholar
  134. Spivey, M. J., Richardson, D. C., & Gonzales-Marquez, M. (2005). On the perceptual-motor and image-schematic infrastructure of language. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 246–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., Stitzlein, C. A., Saner, L., Schunn, C. D., & Kirschenbaum, S. S. (2005). The relationship between spatial transformations and iconic gestures. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 6, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 830–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Tuite, K. (1993). The production of gesture. Semiotica, 93, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wesp, R., Hesse, J., Keutmann, D., & Wheaton, K. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.Google Scholar
  143. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731.Google Scholar
  145. Wohlschläger, A., & Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 954–958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison

Personalised recommendations