Defendants who are accused of serious crimes sometimes feign amnesia to evade criminal responsibility. Previous research has suggested that feigning amnesia might impair subsequent recall. In two experiments, participants read and heard a story about a central character, described as “you,” who was responsible for the death of either a puppy (Experiment 1) or a friend (Experiment 2). On free and cued recall tests immediately after the story, participants who had feigned amnesia recalled less than did participants who had recalled accurately. One week later, when all participants recalled accurately, participants who had previously feigned amnesia still performed worse than did participants who had recalled accurately both times. However, the participants who had formerly feigned amnesia did not perform worse than did a control group who had received only the delayed recall tests. Our results suggest that a “feigned amnesia effect” may reflect nothing more than differential practice at recall. Feigning amnesia for a crime need not impair memory for that crime when a person later seeks to remember accurately.
Free Recall Memory Test Recall Test Correct Recall Intrusion Error
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Bernard, L. C., McGrath, M. J., & Houston, W. (1994). Discriminating between simulated malingering and closed head injury on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 539–551.Google Scholar
Bulevich, J. B., Roediger, H. L., III, Balota, D. A., & Butler, A. C. (2006). Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/ no-think paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1569–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylin, S., & Christianson, S.-A. (2002). Characteristics of malingered amnesia: Consequences of withholding vs. distorting information on later memory of a crime event. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 7, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cercy, S. P., Schretlen, D. J., & Brandt, J. (1997). Simulated amnesia and the pseudo-memory phenomena. In R. Rogers(Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 85–107). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Christianson, S.-A., & Bylin, S. (1999). Does simulating amnesia mediate genuine forgetting for a crime event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelicic, M., Merckelbach, H., & Van Bergen, S. (2004). Symptom validity testing of feigned amnesia for a mock crime. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 525–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopelman, M. D. (1995). The assessment of psychogenic amnesia. In A. D. Baddeley, B. A. Wilson, & F. N. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (pp. 427–448). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mulligan, N. W. (2005). Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: Investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests. Psychological Research, 69, 272–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polage, D. C. (2004). Fabrication deflation? The mixed effects of lying on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyszora, N. M., Barker, A. F., & Kopelman, M. D. (2003). Amnesia for criminal offences: A study of life sentence prisoners. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14, 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinsky, E. W., & Brandt, J. (1986). Amnesia and criminal law: A clinical overview. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 4, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar