Memory & Cognition

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 65–73 | Cite as

The effects of repeated idea elaboration on unconscious plagiarism

Article

Abstract

Unconscious plagiarism occurs in a recall task when someone presents someone else’s idea as his or her own. Recent research has shown that the likelihood of such an error is inflated if the idea is improved during the retention interval, but not if it is imagined. Here, we explore the effects of repeating the elaboration phase during the retention interval. Participants in a group first generated alternate uses to common objects before elaborating the ideas either by imagining them or by improving them. This elaboration phase occurred once, twice, or not at all. Later, they attempted to recall their original ideas and generate new ideas. Repeated imagery did not inflate unconscious plagiarism on either task. In contrast, repeating the improvement phase increased plagiarism to dramatically high levels in the recall task. The latter effect might be particularly pertinent to real-world cases of plagiarism in which the ideas under dispute have been the subject of creative development over many occasions.

Keywords

Retention Interval Elaboration Condition Source Memory Idea Improvement Source Monitoring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brédart, S., Lampinen, J. M., & Defeldre, A. C. (2003). Phenomenal characteristics of cryptomnesia. Memory, 11, 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, A. S., & Halliday, H. E. (1991). Cryptomnesia and source memory difficulties. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating unconscious plagiarism. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 327.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, M. A. V., & Perfect, T. J. (2002). Unconscious plagiarism. In T. J. Perfect & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 146–168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, P., Guilford, J., Merrifield, R., & Wilson, R. (1960). Alternate Uses Test. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Service.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Landau, J. D., & Marsh, R. L. (1997). Monitoring source in an unconscious plagiarism paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Landau, J. D., Marsh, R. L., & Parsons, T. E. (2000). Dissociation of two kinds of source attributions. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 539–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Calvini, G. (1999). Contexts of cryptomnesia: May the source be with you. Social Cognition, 17, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marsh, R. L., & Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marsh, R. L., & Landau, J. D. (1995). Item availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1568–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 669–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 886–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perfect, T. J., & Stark, L.-J. (in press). Tales from the Crypt ... omnesia. In J. Dunlosky & R. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metamemory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Stark, L.-J., & Perfect, T. J. (2006). Elaboration inflation: How your ideas become mine. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stark, L.-J., & Perfect, T. J. (2007). Whose idea was that? Source monitoring for idea ownership following elaboration. Memory, 15, 776–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stark, L.-J., Perfect, T. J., & Newstead, S. (2005). When elaboration leads to appropriation: Unconscious plagiarism in a creative task. Memory, 13, 561- 573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taylor, F. K. (1965). Cryptomnesia and plagiarism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 1111–1118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tenpenny, P. L., Keriazakos, M. S., Lew, G. S., & Phelan, T. P. (1998). In search of inadvertent plagiarism. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 529–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tulving, E., & Hastie, R. (1972). Inhibition effects of intralist repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthEngland

Personalised recommendations