When mirrors lie: “Visual capture” of arm position impairs reaching performance

  • Nicholas P. Holmes
  • Gemma Crozier
  • Charles Spence
Article

Abstract

If we stand at a mirror’s edge, we can see one half of our body reflected in the mirror, as if it were the other half of our body, seen “through” the mirror. We used this mirror illusion to examine the effect of conflicts between visually and proprioceptively specified arm positions on subsequent reaching movements made with the unseen right arm. When participants viewed their static left arm in the mirror (i.e., as if it were their right arm), subsequent right-arm reaching movements were affected significantly more when there was conflict between the apparent visual and the proprioceptively specified right-arm positions than when there was no conflict. This result demonstrates that visual capture of arm position can occur when individual body parts are viewed in the mirror and that this capture has a measurable effect on subsequent reaching movements made with an unseen arm. The result has implications for how the brain represents the body across different sensory modalities.

References

  1. Altschuler, E. L., Wisdom, S. B., Stone, L., Foster, C., Galasko, D., Llewellyn, D. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet, 353, 2035–2036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austen, E. L., Soto-Faraco, S., Eich, E., Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. F. (2003). Limits to body schema remapping in the fake hand illusion. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 112.Google Scholar
  3. Austen, E. L., Soto-Faraco, S., Pinel, J. P. J., & Kingstone, A. F. (2001). Virtual body effect: Factors influencing visual-tactile integration. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 2.Google Scholar
  4. Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Dohle, C., Seitz, R. J., & Freund, H. (1999). Mirror agnosia and mirror ataxia constitute different parietal lobe disorders. Annals of Neurology, 46, 51–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnett, C. T. (1904). Studies in the influence of abnormal position upon the motor impulse. Psychological Review, 11, 370–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graziano, M. S. A., Cooke, D. F., & Taylor, C. S. R. (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science, 290, 1782–1786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory, R. L. (1996). Mirrors in mind. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, C. S. (1965). Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed and displaced vision. Psychological Review, 72, 419–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay, J. C., Pick, H. L., Jr., & Ikeda, K. (1963). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychonomic Science, 2, 215–216.Google Scholar
  11. Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (2004). Body schema and body image: Toward a taxonomy of multisensory bodily manipulations. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  12. Hunter, J. P., Katz, J., & Davis, K. D. (2003). The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain, 126, 579–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson, C. V., & Zangwill, O. L. (1953). Experimental finger dyspraxia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
  14. Lajoie, Y., Paillard, J., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., Fleury, M., Forget, R., & Lamarre, Y. (1992). Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects: Visuoproprioceptive conflict. Neurology, 42, 1104–1106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology, 13, R531-R539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. P., Jenkinson, M., & Rushton, K. (1997). Synaesthesia in the normal limb. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 264, 1007–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Niebauer, C. L., Aselage, J., & Schutte, C. (2002). Hemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality, 7, 85–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielsen, T. I. (1963). Volition: A new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peled, A., Ritsner, M., Hirschmann, S., Geva, A. B., & Modai, I. (2000). Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 1105–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramachandran, V. S., Altschuler, E. L., & Hillyer, S. (1997). Mirror agnosia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 264, 645–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 263, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ro, T., Wallace, R., Hagedorn, J. C., Farnè, A., & Pienkos, E. (2004). Visual enhancing of tactile perception in posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 24–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rossetti, Y., Desmurget, M., & Prablanc, C. (1995). Vectorial coding of movement: Vision, proprioception, or both? Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 457–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sathian, K., Greenspan, A. I., & Wolf, S. L. (2000). Doing it with mirrors: A case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair, 14, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tastevin, J. (1937). En partant de l’expérience d’Aristote: Les déplacements artificiels des parties du corps ne sont pas suivis par le sentiment de ces parties ni par les sensations qu’on peut y produire [Starting from Aristotle’s experiment: The artificial displacements of parts of the body are not followed by feeling in these parts or by the sensations which can be produced there]. L’Encephale, 32, 57–84, 140–158.Google Scholar
  28. Welch, R. B., Widawski, M. H., Harrington, J., & Warren, D. H. (1979). An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 126–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas P. Holmes
    • 1
  • Gemma Crozier
    • 1
  • Charles Spence
    • 1
  1. 1.Room B121, Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations