Shepherd Ivory Franz: His contributions to neuropsychology and rehabilitation



Shepherd I. Franz was an important figure in psychology of the last century, and historians of psychology have given recognition to much of his work. However, his experimental work with animals and his pioneer investigations in experimental and clinical neuropsychology have been largely ignored. This article reviews his conceptual, assessment, and treatment contributions, including (1) his pioneering work on the use of learned behavior as a baseline for the study of cerebral ablations, (2) his interest in brain plasticity, (3) his development of comprehensive psychological assessment methods, and (4) his work on the rehabilitation of neurological patients with techniques derived from his animal experiments. His work predated much of what is now part of the conceptual substance of the experimental and clinical neurosciences.


  1. Bach-y-Rita, P. (1990). Paul Broca: Aphasia and cerebral localization. Current Contents, Life Sciences, 33, 18.Google Scholar
  2. Bach-y-Rita, P. (1995). Nonsynaptic diffusion neurotransmission and late brain reorganization. New York: Demos-Vermande.Google Scholar
  3. Bach-y-Rita, P. (2000). Conceptual issues relevant to present and future neurologic rehabilitation. In H. Levin & J. Grafman (Eds.), Neuroplasticity and reorganization of function after brain injury (pp. 357–379). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bach-y-Rita, P., Wood, S., Leder, R., Paredes, O., Bahr, D., Wicab-Bach-y-Rita, E., & Murillo, N. (2002). Computer-assisted motivating rehabilitation (CAMR) for institutional, home, and educational late stroke programs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  6. Bruce, D. (1986). Lashley’s shift from bacteriology to neuropsychology, 1910–1917, and the influence of Jennings, Watson, and Franz. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22, 27–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce, D. (1991). Integrations of Lashley. In G. A. Kimble, M. Wertheimer, & C. L. White (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 307–323). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Cogan, A., Madey, J., Kaufman, W., Holmlund, G., & Bach-y-Rita, P. (1977). Pong game as a rehabilitation device. In C. G. Warren (Ed.), Fourth Annual Conference on Systems and Devices for the Disabled (pp. 187–188). Seattle, WA: University of Washington School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  9. Day, W. F., Jr. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R.W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. dePedro-Cuesta, J., Widen-Holmqvist, L., & Bach-y-Rita, P. (1992). Evaluation of stroke rehabilitation by randomized controlled studies: A review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 86, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroth, B., & Taub, E. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science, 270, 305–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernberger, S. W. (1933). Shepherd Ivory Franz, 1874–1933. Psychological Bulletin, 30, 741–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finger, S. (1994). Origins of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Flourens, P. (1842). Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux dans les animaux [Experimental investigations of the properties and functions of the nervous system in animals] (2nd ed.). Paris: Ballière.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, R. G. (1986). The Columbian exchange: American physiologists and neuroscience techniques. Federation Proceedings, 45, 2665–2672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Franz, S. I. (1902). On the functions of the cerebrum: I. The frontal lobes in relation to the production and retention of simple sensory-motor habits. American Journal of Physiology, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. Franz, S. I. (1905). Anomalous reaction-times in a case of manicdepressive depression. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franz, S. I. (1906). Observations on the functions of the association areas (cerebrum) in monkeys. Journal of the American Medical Association, 47, 1464–1467.Google Scholar
  19. Franz, S. I. (1912a). Experimental psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 9, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franz, S. I. (1912b). New phrenology. Science, 35, 321–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franz, S. I. (1912c). The present status of psychology in medical education and practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 58, 909–911.Google Scholar
  22. Franz, S. I. (1913a). Observations on the preferential use of the right and left hands by monkeys. Journal of Animal Behavior, 3, 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franz, S. I. (1913b). On psychology and medical education. Science, 38, 555–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franz, S. I. (1915). Symptomatological differences associated with similar cerebral lesions in the insane. Psychological Monographs, 19 (Whole No. 81), 1–79.Google Scholar
  25. Franz, S. I. (1916). The functions of the cerebrum. Psychological Bulletin, 13, 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franz, S. I. (1917a). Cerebral adaptation vs. cerebral organology. Psychological Bulletin, 14, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franz, S. I. (1917b). Report of Committee on Reeducation Research. Psychological Bulletin, 14, 416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franz, S. I. (1919). Handbook of mental examination methods (2nd ed., rev. and enlarged). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Franz, S. I. (1921). Cerebral-mental relations. Psychological Review, 28, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Franz, S. I. (1922). Psychology and psychiatry. Psychological Review, 29, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Franz, S. I. (1923a). Conceptions of cerebral functions. Psychological Review, 30, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Franz, S. I. (1923b). Nervous and mental re-education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Franz, S. I. (1932). Autobiography. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 2, pp. 89–133). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Franz, S. I., & Lashley, K. S. (1917). The retention of habits by the rat after destruction of the frontal portion of the cerebrum. Psychobiology, 1, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Franz, S. I., Scheetz, M. E., & Wilson, A. A. (1915). The possibility of recovery of motor function in long-standing hemiplegia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 65, 2150–2154.Google Scholar
  36. Gregory, R. L. (Ed.) (1987). The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hebb, D. O. (1963). Introduction to Dover edition. In K. S. Lashley, Brain mechanisms and intelligence (pp. v-xiii). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  38. Ives, M. (1970). Psychology at Saint Elizabeth’s: 1907–1970. Professional Psychology, 1, 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lashley, K. S. (1917a). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 169–194.Google Scholar
  40. Lashley, K. S. (1917b). Changes in the amount of salivary secretion associated with cerebral lesions. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 62–72.Google Scholar
  41. Lashley, K. S. (1917c). Modifiability of the preferential use of the hands in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Animal Behavior, 7, 178–186.Google Scholar
  42. Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lashley, K. S., & Franz, S. I. (1917). The effects of cerebral destruction upon habit formation and retention in the albino rat. Psychobiology, 1, 71–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levin, H. S., & Grafman, J. (Eds.) (2000). Cerebral reorganization of function after brain damage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Marshall, L. H., & Magoun, H. W. (1998). Discoveries in the human brain: Neuroscience prehistory, brain structure, and function. Totowa, NJ: Humana.Google Scholar
  46. McReynolds, P. (1997). Lightner Witmer: His life and times. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ogden, R., & Franz, S. I. (1917). On cerebral motor control: The recovery from experimentally produced hemiplegia. Psychobiology, 1, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pike, F. H. (1912). A defence of the “new phrenology.” Science, 35, 619–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Popplestone, J. A., & McPherson, M. W. (1984). Pioneer psychology laboratories in clinical settings. In J. Brozek (Ed.), Explorations in the history of psychology in the United States (pp. 196–272). Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  50. Reisman, J. M. (1976). A history of clinical psychology (rev. ed.). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  51. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Squire, L. R. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 203–231). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sterr, A., Muller, M. M., Elbert, T., Rockstroth, B., Pantev, C., & Taub, E. (1998). Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature, 391, 134–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taub, E., Elbert, T., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2002). Neurorehabilitation and remediation: The melding of basic research in neuroscience and behavioral science to produce advances in therapeutics—An impending paradigm shift. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  56. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., III, Flemming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C. S., Connell, J. S., & Crago, J. E. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 347–354.Google Scholar
  57. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Pidikiti, R. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—A clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 36, 1–8.Google Scholar
  58. Taub, E., & Wolf, S. L. (1997). Constraint induced techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Rehabilitation, 3, 38–61.Google Scholar
  59. Thomas, R. K. (1999). Franz, Shepherd Ivory. In J. A. Garraty & M. C. Carnes (Eds.), American national biography (Vol. 8, pp. 405–406). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Thomas, R. K. (2000). Franz, Shepherd Ivory. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 396–398). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wall, P. D. (1980). Mechanisms of plasticity of connection following damage in adult mammalian nervous systems. In P. Bach-y-Rita (Ed.), Recovery of function. Theoretical considerations for brain injury rehabilitation (pp. 91–105). Lewiston, NY: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  62. Watson, R. I. (1953). A brief history of clinical psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 321–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Watson, R. I. (1971). The great psychologists (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  64. Whishaw, I. Q., & Kolb, B. (1988). Sparing of skilled forelimb reaching and corticospinal projections after neonatal motor cortex removal or hemidecortication in the rat: Support for the Kennard doctrine. Brain Research, 451, 97–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Workers’ Compensation Board of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Departments of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, and Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of WisconsinMadison

Personalised recommendations