Advertisement

Psychonomic Science

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 5–6 | Cite as

Contingent and noncontingent responding in squirrel monkeys as a joint function of quality of, distance from, and schedule of food reinforcement

  • Evalyn F. Segal
Animal Behavior Reinforcement
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Ss worked on chain FI VI, chain FI DRL, multiple SΔ VI or mult SΔ DRL. In chains, onset of the VI or DRL food link was contingent on right-bar presses in the FI link. In multiples, onset of the food component occurred after a preset duration of SΔ, and was not response-contingent. Sucrose or peanut pellets reinforced left-bar presses on the food schedules. Variability among Ss was great, but generally, results were: (1) where quality of the reinforcer made a difference, sucrose maintained higher response rates than peanut, whether responding was contingently or noncontingently reinforced; (2) responding in the components distal to food was somewhat more sensitive to quality of the reinforcer than responding in the proximal food components; (3) with food reinforcement rate in VI and DRL equated, there was no significant effect of type of schedule per se on FI responding in chains, but (4) there was a differential effect on SΔ responding in multiples, with less SΔ responding on mult SΔ DRL than mult SΔ VI.

Keywords

Squirrel Monkey Food Reinforcement Drinking Solution Food Schedule Correlate Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Deadwyler, S. A., & Segal, Evalyn F. Determinants of polydipsia: VII. Removing drinking solution midway through DRL sessions. Psychon. Sci. Google Scholar
  2. Segal, Evalyn F., & Oden, D. L. Determinants of polydipsia in rats: A reply to Stein. I. Emptying the water bottle. Psychon. Sci., 1965a, 2, 201–202.Google Scholar
  3. Segal, Evalyn F., & Deadwyler, S. A. Determinants of polydipsia in rats. II. DRL extinction. Psychon. Sci., 1965b, 2, 203–204.Google Scholar
  4. Segal, Evalyn F., Oden, D. L., & Deadwyler, S. A. Determinants of polydipsia: III. Withholding food on a free-reinforcement schedule. Psychol. Sci., 1965c, 2, 205–206.Google Scholar
  5. Segal, Evalyn F., Oden, D. L., & Deadwyler, S. A. Determinants of polydipsia: IV. Free-reinforcement schedules. Psychon. Sci., 1965d, 3, 11–12.Google Scholar
  6. Segal, Evalyn F., Oden, D. L., & Deadwyler, S. A. Determinants of polydipsia: V. Effect of amphetamine and pentobarbital. Psychon. Sci., 1965e, 3, 33–34.Google Scholar
  7. Segal, Evalyn F., & Deadwyler, S. A. Determinants of polydipsia: VI. Taste of the drinking solution. Psychon. Sci., 1965f, 3, 101–102.Google Scholar
  8. Stein, L. Excessive drinking in the rat: Superstition or thirst? J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1964, 58, 237–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Press 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evalyn F. Segal
    • 1
  1. 1.San Diego State CollegeSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations