Advertisement

Psychonomic Science

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 354–356 | Cite as

Detection of one’s own spontaneous GSRs

  • Robert M. Stern
Perception & Performance

Abstract

Detection of spontaneous GSRs was studied as a function of prior feedback training and size of GSR. The study was designed and analyzed within the framework of the theory of signal detectability. Approximately half of the 57 Ss received GSR feedback training. During the detection period, all Ss heard a low buzz approximately every 30 sec, and they indicated whether or not they thought that they had just made a GSR. They had in approximately half the trials. The results indicated that the particular feedback training used had a small positive effect on detection and that trained Ss could more easily detect their large GSRs.

Keywords

False Alarm Observation Interval Galvanic Skin Response Signal Trial Memory Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. BARON, J. An EEG correlate of autonomic discrimination. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 4, 255–256.Google Scholar
  2. BRENER, J., & HOTHERSALL, D. Heart rate control under conditions of augmented sensory feedback. Psychophysiology, 1966, 3, 23–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BRENER, J., KLEINMAN, R. A., & GOESLING, W. J. The effects of different exposures to augmented sensory feedback on the control of heart rate. Psychophysiology, 1969, 5, 510–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CANNON, W. B. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage. New York: Appleton. 1929.Google Scholar
  5. DONELSON, E. Discrimination of GSR activity. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. EGAN, J. P., & CLARKE, F. R. Psychophysics and signal detection. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. EGAN, J. P., SCHULMAN, A. I., & GREENBERG, G. Z. Memory for waveform and time uncertainty. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1961, 33, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GRIGGS, R. C., & STUNKARD, A. The interpretation of gastric motility: II. Sensitivity and bias in the perception of gastric motility. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1964, 11, 82–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. GUNDY, R. F. Auditory detection of an unspecified signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1961, 33, 1008–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. JAMES, W. What is emotion? Mind, 1884, 9, 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MANDLER, G., & KAHN, M. Discrimination of changes in heart rate: Two unsuccessful attempts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1960, 3, 21–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MILLER, N. E. Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science, 1969, 163, 434–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. STERN, R. M., & KAPLAN, B. E. Galvanic skin responses: Voluntary control and externalization. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1967, 10, 349–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. STUNKARD, A. J., & KOCH, C. The interpretation of gastric motility: I. Apparent bias in the reports of hunger by obese persons. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1964, 11, 82–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. SWETS, J. A., TANNER, W. P., & BIRDSALL, T. C. Decision processes in perception. Psychological Review, 1961, 68, 301–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Stern
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations