Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 187–190 | Cite as

Race-related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I

  • Alvin G. Goldstein


Physical anthropological measures of faces of Japanese, whites, and blacks were obtained from several published sources. Comparisons among three racial groups yielded no evidence for racial differences in facial heterogeneity, but features of Japanese women’s faces may display more variation than the other faces studied.


Racial Group Facial Feature Physical Anthropology Feature Variability Black Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Robbins, M. Personal communication, October 1978.Google Scholar


  1. Chance, J., Goldstein, A. G., & McBride, L. Differential experience and recognition memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, 97, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. Sex, race, age and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 10, 393–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedlaender, J. S. Patterns of human variation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Goldstein, A. G. Facial feature variation: Anthropometric data II. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979, 13, 191–193.Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. Measuring psychological similarity of faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 7, 407–408Google Scholar
  6. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. Judging face similarity in own and other races. Journal of Psychology, 1978, 98, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. Do “foreign” faces really look alike? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979, 13, 111–113.Google Scholar
  8. Herskovits, M. J. The anthropometry of the American negro. New York: Columbia University Press, 1930.Google Scholar
  9. Hooton, E. A., & Dupertuis, C. W. The physicial anthropology of Ireland. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology, 1955, 30, Nos. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
  10. Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 13, 330–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miklashevskaya, N. M. Growth of the head and face in boys of various ethnic groups in the USSR. Human Biology, 1966, 38, 231–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Montagu, M. F. A. A handbook of anthropometry. Springfield, III: Thomas, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olivier, G. Practical anthropology. Springfield, III: Thomas, 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Shapiro, H. L. Migration and environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
  15. Shepherd, J. W., Deregowski, J. B., & Ellis, H. D. A cross- cultural study of recognition memory for faces. International Journal of Psychology, 1974, 9, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Steegmann, A. T., Jr. Reliability testing of a facial contouro-meter. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1970, 33, 241–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steegmann, A. T., Jr. Cold response, body form, and craniofacial shape in two racial groups of Hawaii. American Journal of Physical anthropology, 1972, 37, 193–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alvin G. Goldstein
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbia

Personalised recommendations