Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 47–49 | Cite as

Are incidental learning tasks measuring elaboration of coding, or just overloading retrieval cues?

  • Marc A. Lindberg
  • Delos D. Wickens


Craik and Tulving (1975) suggest that an “overloading of retrieval cues” explanation might serve as an alternative to their elaboration of coding theory of incidental learning data. Physical processing instructions require items to share the same encoding question, and thus can create more competition at recall than items of semantic instructions, which have unique questions. In an incidental learning task, 100 subjects named the colors in which words were printed. Recall of congruent words, for example, “money” printed in green, was superior to recall of incongruent words, for example, “money” printed in yellow, which in turn was superior to that of color-neutral control words. Since the items differed qualitatively in richness of information, and not in number of retrieval cues, it was concluded that the “overloading of retrieval cues” explanation cannot serve as a complete account of incidental learning phenomena.


Target Word Incongruent Condition Congruent Condition Color Naming Naming Latency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalrymple-Alford, E. E., & Azkoal, J. The locus of interference in the Stroop and related tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 90, 227–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Schulman, A. I. Memory for words recently classified. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wickens, D. D. Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc A. Lindberg
    • 1
  • Delos D. Wickens
    • 2
  1. 1.St. Olaf CollegeNorthfield
  2. 2.Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations