Advertisement

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 208–210 | Cite as

Temporal resolution of successive brief stimuli for the tongue and hand

  • Linda Petrosino
  • Donald Fucci
Article
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

The temporal resolving power of the tactile sensory system was examined by obtaining fusion thresholds for a two-pulse vibratory stimulus. Fusion thresholds were obtained from the tongue and thenar eminence of the hand for 24 adult subjects. The means of the fusion thresholds for the tongue (24.63 msec) for the thenar eminence (24.73 msec) were found to be statistically similar. The similarity in fusion thresholds for the two test sites suggests that for this suprathreshold task the tactile modality responds as a whole, regardless of body location. Results are discussed with respect to cutaneous fusion values already reported in the literature.

Keywords

Test Site Cutaneous System Thenar Eminence Fusion Point Magnitude Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  2. Fucci, D., Harris, D., & Petrosino, L. 1983). The effect of contractor area on vibrotactile magnitude function exponents for the tongue and hand. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fucci, D., & Petrosino, L. (1983). Lingual vibrotactile sensation magnitudes: Comparison of suprathreshold responses for the tongue and hand. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 351–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Geldard, F. A., & Sherrick, C. E. (1971). Cutaneous temporal acuity. Princeton Cutaneous Reports, 18, 8–10.Google Scholar
  5. Gengel, R. W., & Hirsh, I. J. (1970). Temporal order: The effect of single versus repeated presentations, practice, and verbal feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gescheider, G. A. (1966). Resolving of successive clicks by the ears and skin. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 378–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gescheider, G. A. (1967). Auditory and cutaneous resolution of successive brief stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 570–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gescheider, G. A. (1974). Temporal relations in cutaneous stimulation. In F. A. Geldard (Ed.), Cutaneous communication systems and devices. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.Google Scholar
  9. Hirsh, I. J., & Sherrick, C. E. (1961). Perceived order in different sense modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 423–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenshalo, D. R. (1978). Biophysics and psychophysics of feeling. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.), Handbook of perception. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Petrosino, L. (1983). Cutaneous temporal resolution assessed by the critical fusion threshold technique. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.Google Scholar
  12. Rosner, B. S. (1961). Neural factors limiting cutaneous spatiotemporal discriminations. In W. R. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  13. Telage, K., & Warren, J. (1977). Spatial summation effects on lingual vibrotactile thresholds. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 44, 1179–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thornbury, J. M., & Mistretta, C. M. (1981). Tactile sensitivity as a function of age. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 34–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Uttal, W. R. (1959). A comparison of neural and psychological responses in the somesthetic system. Journal of Comparative Physiology & Psychology, 52, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Verrillo, R. T. (1966). Effect of spatial parameters on the vibrotactile threshold. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 570–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verrillo, R. T., & Chamberlain, S. C. (1972). The effect of neural density and contactor surround on vibrotactile sensation magnitude. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Petrosino
    • 1
  • Donald Fucci
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Hearing and Speech SciencesOhio UniversityAthens

Personalised recommendations