Advertisement

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 229–232 | Cite as

Indirect word priming in connected semantic and phonological contexts

  • Carmen Overson
  • George Mandler
Article

Abstract

Indirect activation was explored by presenting subjects with short passages and poems that were designed to activate relevant semantic and phonological (rhyming) representations. The effect of activation was tested with the word completion test in which subjects completed initial stems of target words. The targets were related to the semantic and phonological contexts but had not themselves been presented in the passages. Both semantic and phonological contexts produced equivalent, but short-lasting, activation effects. Evidence is presented that such effects are automatic, without subjects’ (conscious) reference to the source of the activation.

Keywords

Target Word Recognition Test Completion Rate Completion Task Semantic Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3, Pt. 2).Google Scholar
  2. Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Graf, P., Mandler, G., & Haden, P. (1982). Simulating amnesic symptoms in normal subjects. Science, 218, 1243–1244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. KuČera, H., & Francis, W. ( 1967 ). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lees, G. (1981). The modern rhyming dictionary. Greenwich, CT: Cherry Lane.Google Scholar
  6. Mandler, G. (1979). Organization and repetition: Organizational principles with special reference to rote learning. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing; The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mandler, G. (1985). Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Mandler, G., Graf, P., & Kraft, D. (1986). Activation and elaboration effects in recognition and word priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 645–662.Google Scholar
  10. Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesia: Consolidation or retrieval? Nature, 228, 628–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmen Overson
    • 1
  • George Mandler
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Human Information ProcessingUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La Jolla

Personalised recommendations