Advertisement

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 222–224 | Cite as

Comparison of midline and off-midline lingual vibrotactile threshold responses in men and women

  • Donald Fucci
  • Jim Cantrell
  • Linda Petrosino
  • Randall R. Robey
Article
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Lingual vibrotactile thresholds were obtained from 10 young adult men and 10 young adult women on three different lingual test sites at a frequency of 250 Hz. The lingual test sites chosen for study were: (1) the dorsal midline of the anterior portion of the tongue, (2) a point halfway between the dorsal midline and the right upper lateral border of the tongue, and (3) a point halfway between the dorsal midline and the left upper lateral border of the tongue. Results showed that thresholds obtained on the dorsal midline of the tongue were not statistically significantly different for the men and women, but thresholds obtained off midline in either direction were statistically significantly different for the two groups of subjects. Compared with the midline thresholds, the off-midline thresholds were seen to become higher for the male subjects, but they were seen to become lower for the female subjects. Implications of these results for future testing are discussed, and further research dealing with off-midline lingual vibrotactile measurement is recommended.

Keywords

Trigeminal Neuralgia Lateral Border Dorsal Midline Left Index Finger Vibrotactile Threshold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cosh, J. A. Studies on the nature of vibration sense. Clinical Science, 1953, 12, 131–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fucci, D. Oral vibrotactile sensation: An evaluation of normal and defective speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1972, 15, 179–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fucci, D., & Crary, M. A. Oral vibrotactile sensation and perception: State of the art. In N. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Goff, G. D., Rosner, B. S., Detre, T., & Kennard, D. Vibration perception in normal men and medical patients. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1965, 28, 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Marsh, G. R. Perceptual changes with aging. In E. W. Busse & D. G. Blazer (Eds.), Handbook of geriatric psychiatry. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Plumb, C. S., & Meigs, J. W. Human vibration perception: Part 1. Vibration perception at different ages. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1961, 4, 611–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ringel, R. L. Oral sensation and perception: A selective review. In R. T. Wertz (Ed.), Speech and the dentofacial complex: The state of the art. Washington, D.C: American Speech and Hearing Association, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. Ringel, R. L., & Ewanowski, S. J. Oral perception: 1. Two-point discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1965, 8, 389–398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sherrick, C. E. Variables affecting sensitivity of the human skin to mechanical vibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 45, 273–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Steinberg, F. U., & Graber, A. L. The effect of age and peripheral circulation on the perception of vibration. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1963, 44, 645–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Steiness, J. Vibratory perception in normal subjects. Acta Medica Scandinavica, 1957, 158, 315–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stevens, J. P., & Barcikowski, R. S. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Washington, D.C: University Press of America, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Verrillo, R. T. Specificity of a cutaneous receptor. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Verrillo, R. T. Comparison of vibrotactile threshold and suprathreshold responses in men and women. Perception & Psychophysics, 1979, 26, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Verrillo, R. T., & Ecker, A. D. Effects of root or nerve destruction on vibrotactile sensitivity in trigeminal neuralgia. Pain, 1977, 3, 239–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weinstein, S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.), The skin senses. Springfield, Ill: Thomas, 1968.Google Scholar
  17. Whanger, A. D., & Wang, H. A. Clinical correlates of the vibratory sense in elderly psychiatric patients. Journal of Gerontology, 1974, 29, 39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Fucci
    • 1
  • Jim Cantrell
    • 1
  • Linda Petrosino
    • 1
  • Randall R. Robey
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Hearing and Speech SciencesOhio UniversityAthens

Personalised recommendations