Advertisement

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 456–458 | Cite as

Luminance controls the perceived 3-D structure of dynamic 2-D displays

  • Barry J. Schwartz
  • George Sperling
Article

Abstract

The accurate three-dimensional (3-D) appearance of two-dimensional (2-D) shadow projections cast by rotating 3-D objects-the kinetic depth effect (KDE)-frequently is used to visualize depth in computer-generated displays representing complex structures. According to current perceptual theories, the addition of simulated linear perspective will prevent illusory reversals of perspective associated with the KDE, due to the geometric fact that the reversed-perspective percept is inconsistent with rigid object rotation. However, the reversed, nonrigid perceptual state can be induced by correlating luminance with the represented nearness of luminous lines, thus overriding geometric cues of form and motion that are supposed to govern the perception of rigid objects in the KDE. This finding complicates theories of 3-D motion perception based on 2-D arrays, but is of practical value in the design of visual displays representing complex 3-D objects.

Keywords

Rigid Object Parallel Projection Linear Perspective Static Preview Polar Projection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Attneave, F. Multistability in perception. Scientific American, 1971, 225(12), 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, H. H., & Lappin, J. S. Sufficient conditions for the discrimination of motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Börjesson, E., & Von Hofsten, C. Spatial determinants of depth perception in two-dot motion patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braunstein, M. L. Depth perception through motion. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Gibson, J. J. The senses considered as a perceptual system. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. Gregory, R. L. The intelligent eye. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Grossberg, S. Competition, decision, and consensus. Journal of Mathematical analysis and applications. 1978, 66, 470–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hay, J. C. Optical motions and space perception: An extension of Gibson’s analysis. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 550–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hershberger, W. A. Comment on the “apparent reversal (oscillation) of rotary motion in depth. ” Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 235–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hochberg, J. E. Perception. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1964.Google Scholar
  11. Johansson, G. Visual motion perception. Scientific American, 1973, 232(6), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koffka, K. Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt. Brace & World, 1935.Google Scholar
  13. Marr, D. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. Sperling, G. Binocular vision: A physical and neural theory. American Journal of Psychology, 1970, 83, 461–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sperling, G. The description and luminous calibration of cathode ray oscilloscope visual displays. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1971, 3, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sperling, G. Mathematical models of binocular vision. In S.Grossberg (Ed.), Mathematical psychology and psychophysiology. Providence, R.I: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics-American Mathematical Association (SIAM-AMS) Proceedings, 1981, 13, 281-300.Google Scholar
  17. Todd, J. T. Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: A geometric analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982, 8, 238–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ullman, S. The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Wallach, H., & O’connell, D. N. The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 45, 205–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry J. Schwartz
    • 1
  • George Sperling
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Information Processing Laboratory, Department of PsychologyNew York UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations