Advertisement

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 187–188 | Cite as

Marriage: Direct and continuous measurement

  • Diane DeA. Edwards
  • Joseph S. Edwards
Article

Abstract

Marriage partners who were college students were asked to count and chart the frequency of marital behaviors (sexual intercourse, arguments, and socials) per day for a period of at least 3 months. Functional relationships were found between arguments and sex. Couples who engaged in sexual intercourse at a higher rate than they argued described their marriage as “happy.” Marriages with rates of argument higher than rates of intercourse described their relationship as “definitely unhappy.” Daily records of these behaviors functionally pinpointed and quantified changes in the status of a couple’s marriage across time. In marriages described as “tolerable,” the sex rate was only slightly higher than the rate of arguments, but both rates were extremely low.

Keywords

Sexual Intercourse Marital Relationship Daily Record Marriage Partner Marital Happiness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bach, G., & Wyden, P. The intimate enemy. New York: William Monrow, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, W. A. Marriage research and conflict: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 73, 41–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. Husbands and wives. In R. R. Bell (Ed.), Studies in marriage and the family. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A. The American way of marriage. Psychology Today, 1975, 9, 37–43.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, K. B. Factors in the sex life of twenty-two hundred women. New York: Harper, 1929.Google Scholar
  6. Dickinson, R. L., & Beam, L. A. A thousand marriages. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1931.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. S. Words vs records: A practical behavior recording exercise for psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 1976, 3, 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton, G. V. A research in marriage. New York: Albert & Charles Boni, 1929.Google Scholar
  9. Kinsey, C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. Sexual behavior in the human female. New York: Saunders, 1953.Google Scholar
  10. Landis, J. T., & Landis, M. G. Building a successful marriage (4th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Locke, H. J. Predicting adjustment in marriage: A comparison of a divorced and a happily married group. New York: Henry Holt, 1951.Google Scholar
  12. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Pace, C. R. Problems in family relationships among young married adults. Marriage and Family Living, 1940, 2, 42–43.Google Scholar
  14. Terman, L. M. Prediction data. Marriage and Family Living, 1950, 12, 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Waller, W. W., & Hill, R. The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Holt, 1951.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane DeA. Edwards
    • 1
  • Joseph S. Edwards
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Missouri Kansas City

Personalised recommendations