Advertisement

Psychonomic Science

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 348–350 | Cite as

Information load, group organization, and communication frequency

  • Siegfried Streufert
  • Thomas Cafferty
  • Frances Cherry
Memory, Learning, & Thinking Social Processes

Abstract

Four-man teams participated in a complex decision-making task. They were separated into decision-making and information acquisition dyads who could communicate via telephone only. All information was received by acquisition dyads who were free to call decision makers whenever they chose. The effect of suboptimal, optimal (one item of information per 3 min), and superoptimal information load presented to acquisition dyads on their frequency of communications to decision makers was investigated. Increasing information load produced increasing communication frequency. The slope of the curve relating information load to communication frequency was linear but less slanted than a 1:1 input/output relationship would predict. Communication frequency was significantly different from, but more similar to, optimal information load than to experimentally induced information load. It appears that information acquisition groups can be of some value in improving information flow to decision makers. However, “imaginary” information may be transmitted to the decision makers when the amount of information received is low and suboptimal.

Keywords

Decision Maker Information Acquisition Experimental Social Psychology Information Load Communication Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ALLPORT, G. W., & POSTMAN, L. The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt, 1947.Google Scholar
  2. BARTLETT, F. C. Remembering, a study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
  3. CAMPBELL, D. T. Systematic error on the part of human links in communication systems. Information & Control, 1958, 1, 334–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CAMPBELL, D. T., & GRUEN, W. Progression from simple to complex as a molar law of learning. Journal of General Psychology, 1958, 59, 237–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DRIVER, M. J., & STREUFERT, S. Group composition, input load, and group information processing. Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, & Management Sciences, Purdue University, Paper 142, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. DRIVER, M. J., & STREUFERT S. Integrative complexity: An approach to individuals and groups as information-processing systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14 272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. SCHRODER, H. M., DRIVER, M. J., & STREUFERT, S. Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967.Google Scholar
  8. STREUFERT, S. Complexity and complex decision making: Convergences between differentiation and integration approaches to the prediction of task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1970, 6, 494–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. STREUFERT, S., CASTORE, C. H., & KLIGER, S. C. A tactical and negotiations game: Rationale, method and analysis. ONR Technical Report, Rutgers University, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. STREUFERT, S., & DRIVER, M. J. Conceptual structure, information load and perceptual complexity. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 3, 249–250.Google Scholar
  11. STREUFERT, S., DRIVER, M. J., & HAUN, K. H. Components of response rate in complex decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 3, 236–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. STREUFERT, S., & FROMKIN, H. L. Complexity and social influence. In J. Tedeschi (Ed.), Social influence processes. Chicago: Aldine, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. STREUFERT, S., KLIGER, S. C, CASTORE, C. H., & DRIVER, M. J. A tactical and negotiations game for analysis of integration across decision areas. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 155–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. STREUFERT, S., & SCHRODER, H. M. Conceptual structure, environmental complexity and task performance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1965, 1, 132–137.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siegfried Streufert
    • 1
  • Thomas Cafferty
    • 1
  • Frances Cherry
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations