Advertisement

Psychonomic Science

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 49–50 | Cite as

Suppression and recovery of a human response as a function of the temporal order of reward and punishment

  • Robert D. Hare
Human Learning and Thinking Reinforcement
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Punishment (shock) administered during or after reward (interesting pictures) produced greater suppression of a human response than did punishment administered prior to reward. These results indicate that the degree of response-suppression depends upon the temporal arrangement of reward and punishment.

Keywords

Temporal Order Human Response BRITISH COLUMBIA Great Suppression Aversive Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Banks, R. K., & Vogel-Sprott, M. Effect of delayed punishment on an immediately rewarded response in humans. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 70, 357–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Church, R. M. The varied effects of punishment on behavior. Psychol. Rev., 1963, 70, 369–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hare, R. D. Suppression of verbal behavior as a function of delay and schedule of severe punishment. J. verbal Learn. verbal Behav., 1965, 4, 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hare, R. D. Psychopathy and choice of immediate versus delayed punishment. J. abnorm. Psychol., 1966, 71, 25–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Logan, F. A., & Wagner, A. R. Reward and punishment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1965.Google Scholar
  6. Martin, B. Reward and punishment associated with the same goal response: a factor in the learning of motives. Psychol. Bull., 1963, 60, 441–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Solomon, R. L. Punishment. Amer. Psychologist, 1964, 19, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Press 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Hare
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations