Physiological Psychology

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 405–410

Taste preferences of the cat for neurophysiologically active compounds

  • Thomas D. White
  • James C. Boudreau


Six naturally occurring compounds which have been observed to be physiologically active in the anesthetized cat are also demonstrated to be behaviorally active in terms of preference and avoidance. Using a two-bottle long-term preference experiment, concentrations of.5, 5, 50 mM L-proline, L-lysine, L-histidine, L-tryptophan, L-isoleucine, and adenine (all in 50 mM NaCl) were compared against 50 mM saline. At 50 mM concentration, those chemicals which elicit ah increase in spike output from geniculate ganglion chemoresponsive group II units (L-proline, L-lysine, and L-histidine) were found to be preferred, while L-tryptophan, L-isoleucine, and adenine, which decrease group II discharge, were avoided. The preference response to L-proline was then observed over a concentration range extending to 500 mM. Maximum response was observed at 50 mM, with preference decreasing as concentration was either increased or decreased.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Boudreau, J. C, Anderson, W., & Oravec, J. Cat geniculate ganglion: Chemical determinants of chemoresponsive group II unit discharge. In preparation.Google Scholar


  1. Bartoshuk, L. M., Howard, M. A., & Parks, L. H. Taste of water in the cat, effects on sucrose preference. Science, 1971, 171,699-701.Google Scholar
  2. Batzer, O. P., Santoro, A. T., & Landman, W. A. Identification of some beef flavor precursors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1962, 10, 94–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg, C. P. Physiology of the D-amino acid. Physiological Review, 1953, 33, 145–189.Google Scholar
  4. Boudreau, J. C. Neural encoding in cat geniculate ganglion tongue units. Chemical Senses and Flavor, 1974, 1, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boudreau, J. C., & Alev, N. Classiflcation of chemoresponsive tongue units of the cat geniculate ganglion. Brain Research, 1973, 54, 157–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boudreau, J. C. Bradley, B. E., Bierer, P. R., Kruger, S., & Tsuchitani C. Single unit recordings from the geniculate ganglion of the cat. Experimental Brain Research, 1971, 13, 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaudreau, J. C., & Tsuchitani, C. The cat, Felis catus. In J. C. Boudreau and C. Tsuchitani, Sensory neurophysiology. New York: Van Nostrand Rheinhold, 1973. Pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
  8. Gagan, R. H., & Maller, O. Taste of sugars: Brief exposure single stimulus behavioral method. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974, 87, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, J. A. Species differences in taste preferences. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956, 48, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, M. J., Hagiwara, S., & Zotterman, Y. The response spectrum of taste fibers in the cat: A single fiber analysis. Acta Physiologia Scandinavica, 1955, 33, 316–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier, G., & Bolles, R. Some determinants of intake of sucrose solutions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968, 45, 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ewer, R. F. The carnivores. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, L. N., & Lawrence, A. R. The physicochemical aspects of the sense of taste. Journal of Chemical Education, 1958, 35, 436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guttman, N. Equal reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal sweetness values. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1954, 47, 358–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagstrom, E. C., & Pfaffman, C. Relative taste effectiveness of different sugars for the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959, 52, 259–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halpern, B. P., Bernard, R. A., & Kare, N. R. Amino acids as gustatory stimuli in the rat. Journal of General Physiology, 1962, 45, 686–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harper, A. E., Benevenga, N. J., & Wohlhueter, R. M. Effects of ingestion of disproportionate amounts of amino acids. Physiological Review, 1970, 50, 428–558.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, H. L. Some physical, metabolic, and sensory components in the appetite for glucose. American Journal of Physiology, 1962, 203, 1045–1054.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, N. R. Fish flavors. In H. W. Schultz, E. A. Day, and L. M. Libbey (Eds.), Chemistry and physiology of flavors. Westport, Conn: Avi, 1967. Pp. 267–295.Google Scholar
  20. Kare, M. R. Comparative aspects of the sense of taste. In M. R. Kare & B. P. Halpern (Eds.), Physiological and behavioral aspects of taste. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1961. Pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
  21. Kare, M. R. Comparative study of taste. In L. M. Beidles (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. IV) Chemical senses (Part 2): Taste. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971. Pp. 278–292.Google Scholar
  22. Kirimura, J., Shimuza, A., Kimizuka, A., Niromiya, T., & Katsuya, N. The contribution of peptides and amino acids to the taste of foodstuffs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1969, 17, 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuninaka, A. Flavor potentiators. In H. W. Schultz, E. A. Day, & L. M. Libbey (Eds.), Chemistry and physiology of flavors. Westport, Conn: Avi, 1967. Pp. 515–535.Google Scholar
  24. Lawrence, A. R., & Ferguson, L. W. Exploratory physiochemical studies on the sense of taste. Nature, 1959, 183, 1469–1471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCleary, R. a. Taste and post ingestion factors in specific hunger behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1953, 46, 411–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfaffman, C. Gustatory afferent impulses. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 1941, 17, 243-258.Google Scholar
  27. Richter, C. P. Salt taste threshold of nonnal and adrenalectomized rats. Endocrinology, 1939, 24, 367–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richter, C. P. Total self-regulatory functions in animals and human beings. In The Harvey lectures XXXVIII. Science Press. 1943.Google Scholar
  29. Richter, C. P.. & Cambell, K. H. Taste thresholds and taste preferences of rats for five common sugars. Journal of Nutrition, 1940, 20, 31–46.Google Scholar
  30. Rofe, P. C, & Anderson, R. S. Food preferences in domestic pets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 1970, 29, 330–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sato, M., Yamashita, S., & Ogawa, H. Potentiation of gustatory response to monosodium glutamate in rat chorda tympani fibers by addition of 5’-ribonucleotides. Japanese Journal of Physiology, 1970, 20, 444–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaller, G. B. The Serengeti lion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, P. P. The special features of nutrition of cats, with observation on wild Felidae nutrition in the London Zoo. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 1968, 21, 21–36.Google Scholar
  34. Shuford, E. H. Palatability and osmotic pressure of glucose and sucrose solutions as determinants of intake. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959, 52, 150–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegel, S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
  36. Simpson, P. C. & Booth, D. A., Food preferences acquired by association with variation in amino acid nutrition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 23, 135-145.Google Scholar
  37. Simpson, P. C., & Booth, D. A. Olfactory conditioning by association with histidine free or balanced amino acid loads in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 25, 354–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solms, J., Vuataz. L., & Egli, R. H. The taste of L-and D-amino acids. Exerientia, 1964, 21, 692–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Solms, J. Nonvolatile compounds and the flavour of foods. In G. Ohloft and A. E. Thomas (Eds.), Gustation and olfaction, an international symposium. New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 92–110.Google Scholar
  40. Soulariac, A. La physiologic dun compartement, I’eppetit glucidique et sa regulation neuroendocrine chez les rongeurs. Bulletin Biologique de la France et Belgique, 1947, 81, 274–432.Google Scholar
  41. Jacobson’s organ and the trigeminal system. In L. M. Beidler (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. IV) Chemical senses (Part I) Olfaction. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971. Pp. 151–181.Google Scholar
  42. Yamashita, S., Ogawa, H., & Sato, M. The enhancing action of 5’ ribonucleotides on rat gustatory nerve fiber response to monosodium glutamate. Japanese Journal of Physiology, 1973, 23, 59–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Young, P. T. The hedonic organization and regulation of behavior. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 59–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zotterman, Y. Action potentials in the glossopharyngeal nerve and chorda tvmpani. Skandinavishes Archive fur Physiologie, 1935, 72, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas D. White
    • 1
  • James C. Boudreau
    • 1
  1. 1.Sensory Sciences Center, Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of TexasHouston

Personalised recommendations