Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 531–536 | Cite as

The quality of false memory over time: Is memory for misinformation “remembered” or “known”?

Brief Reports
  • 2.4k Downloads

Abstract

The conscious quality of eyewitness memory for misinformation after different retention intervals was investigated in two experiments. Participants viewed computer-projected slides depicting a crime (encoding phase), read a narrative containing misinformation, and took a recall test about the original event. Remember/know judgments were made for each response. A “remember” judgment indicated that the participant vividly recalled seeing a detail in the encoding phase. A “know” judgment indicated that the participant believed that a detail was presented but did not vividly remember it. Generally, misinformation was more likely to be associated with a know judgment than with a remember judgment after a short retention interval. This outcome suggests that, in many cases, misleading information is judged as having a different subjective quality than memory for actual events. However, over a relatively long retention interval, misinformation that simply added new information about the event was more often judged as remembered.

References

  1. Belli, R. F. (1989). Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., &McCarthy, T. T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals.Memory & Cognition,22, 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belli, R. F., &Loftus, E. F. (1994). Recovered memories of childhood abuse: A source monitoring perspective. In S. J. Lynn & J. Rhue (Eds.),Dissociation: Theory, clinical, and research perspectives (pp. 415–433). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Frost, P. J., &Weaver, C. A., III (1997). Overcoming misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: Effects of encoding time and event cues.Memory,5, 725–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,19, 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm.Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal,7, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lane, S. M., &Zaragoza, M. S. (1995). The recollective experience of cross-modality confusion errors.Memory & Cognition,23, 607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemke, T. (1995).Graphics converter [Computer software]. Author.Google Scholar
  10. Loftus, E. F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H. G., &Schooler, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held.Memory & Cognition,17, 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Remembering and knowing as states of consciousness during retrieval. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 213–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Reyna, V. F., &Titcomb, A. L. (1997). Constraints on the suggestibility of eyewitness testimony: A fuzzy-trace theory analysis. In D. G. Payne & F. G. Conrad (Eds.),Intersections in basic and applied memory research (pp. 157–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Roediger, H. L., III,Jacoby, J. D., &McDermott, K. B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: Creating false memories through repeated retrieval.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schooler, J.W., Gerhard, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. Underwood, J., &Pezdek, K. (1998). Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weingardt, K. R., Leonesio, R. J., &Loftus, E. F. (1994). Knowing about knowing. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.),Viewing eyewitness research from a metacognitive perspective (pp. 157–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  21. Zaragoza, M. S., &Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories.Psychological Science,7, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesRivier CollegeNashua

Personalised recommendations