Memory & Cognition

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 461–468

Telescoping in dating naturally occurring events

  • Charles P. Thompson
  • John J. Skowronski
  • D. John Lee
Article

Abstract

Telescoping effects in date estimation were examined in four diary studies. The data show that substantial telescoping can begin as soon as 8 weeks after an event occurs. These studies also found a slight, but typically nonreliable, tendency to make time expansion errors for recent events. Analyses of these data showed that telescoping cannot be attributed to the clarity-of-memory hypothesis proposed by Bradburn, Rips, and Shevell (1987) or to an artifact produced by guessing. An implicit strategy involving estimation of the number of intervening events was proposed to account for the results.

References

  1. Block, R. A. (1974). Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect.Memory &Cognition,2, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, R. A. (1978). Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity.Memory & Cognition,6, 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., &Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys.Science,236, 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, N. R., Rips, L. J., &Shevell, S. K. (1985). The subjective dates of natural events tn very-long-term memory.Cognitive Psychology,17, 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1985).Criminal victimization in the United States, 1983 (NCJ Publication No 96459). Washington, DC. U S Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  6. Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. In M R. Rosenzweig & L. W Porter (Eds.),Annual Review of Psychology,35, 1–36.Google Scholar
  7. Gray, P. G. (1955). The memory factor in social surveys.Journal of the American Statistical Association,50, 344–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrmann, D. J., &Neisser, U. (1978) An inventory of everyday experiences. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & N Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 35–51) New York. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Larsen, S. (1987, August). Memory for reported events. Paper presented at the Second Internattonal Conference on Practacal Aspects of Memory, Swansea, Wales.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, D. J. (1987).Memory for naturally-occurring events Experienced versus reported events and telescoping in dating estimation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.Google Scholar
  11. Loftus, E. F., &Marburger, W. (1983) Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmark events.Memory & Cognition,11, 114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Monson, T C, &Snyder, M. (1977). Actors, observers, and the attribution process: Toward a reconceptualization.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,13, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Center For Health Statistics (1981).Plan and operation of the second national health and nutrition examination survey 1976–80 (DHHS Publicalaon No. 81-1317). Waslungton, DC U.S. Government Pnntmg Office.Google Scholar
  14. National Center For Health Statistics (1985).The national health interview survey design, 1973–84, and procedures, 1975–83 (DHHS Publication No. 85-1320). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  15. Neter, J., &Waksberg, J. (1964). A study of response errors in expenditures data from household interviews.Journal of the American Statistical Association,59, 17–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robinson, J. A. (1986). Temporal reference systems and autobiographical memory. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.),Autobiographical memory (pp. 159–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kogan, W. G. (1981).Issues in the measurement of victimization (Report No. NCJ-74682). Washington, DC Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  18. Thompson, C. P. (1982). Memory for unique personal events: The roommate study.Memory & Cognition,10, 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson, C. P. (1985a). Memory for unique personal events: Effect of pleasantness.Motivation & Emotion,9, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson, C. P. (1985b). Memory for unique personal events Some effects of the personal schema.Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications,4, 267–280.Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, C. P., Skowronski, J. J., & Lee, D. J. (1987, August).Reconstructing the date of a personal event. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Practical Aspects of Memory, Swansea, Wales.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles P. Thompson
    • 1
  • John J. Skowronski
    • 2
  • D. John Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKansas State UniversityManhattan
  2. 2.Ohio State University at NewarkNewark
  3. 3.Tabor CollegeHillsboro

Personalised recommendations