Advertisement

Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 193–198 | Cite as

The effects of isolation rearing on exploration in the rat

  • B. J. Sahakian
  • T. W. Robbins
  • S. D. Iversen
Article

Abstract

The hypothesis that isolation rearing enhances exploration was tested in two settings which varied the extent to which exploratory behavior would be affected by competing hyperactivity. Experiment 1 measured exploration as contact of a discrete novel stimulus, in terms of bout frequency and duration. Locomotor activity was measured by photocell beam interruption. Isolation-reared rats were hyperactive, showed an increased incidence of exploratory bouts but no differences in duration of exploratory behavior, compared with group-reared controls. Experiment 2 measured, independently, locomotor activity and the preference for a novel environment over a familiar one. Isolation-reared rats, whether male or female, showed enhanced novelty preference compared with controls. No significant differences were found in locomotor activity. The results are discussed in terms of the hyperactivity of isolates interfering with investigative behavior by response incompatibility.

Keywords

Locomotor Activity Stimulus Object Novelty Preference Isolation Rear Investigative Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Berlyne, D. E. Arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955,48, 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlyne, D. E. Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dyne, L. J., &Hughes, R. N. Effects of methylphenidate on activity and reaction to novelty in rats.Psychonomic Science, 1970,19, 267–268.Google Scholar
  4. Ehrlich, A. Effects of past experience on exploratory behaviour in rats.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961,15, 15–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Einon, D. F., &Morgan, M. J. Habituation of object contact in socially-reared and isolated rats (Rattus Norvegicus).Animal Behaviour, 1976,24, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Einon, D. F., Morgan, M. J., &Sahakian, B. J. The development of intersession habituation and emergence in sociallyreared and isolated rats.Developmental Psychobiology, 1976,8, 553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Einon, D. F., Stewart, J., Atkinson, S., &Morgan, M. J. Effects of isolation on barbiturate anaesthesia in the rat.Psychopharmacologia (Bed.) 1976,50, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Konrad, K., &Melzack, R. Novelty-enhancement effects associated with early sensory-social isolation. In A. Riesen (Ed.),The developmental neuropsychology of sensory deprivation. London: Academic Press, 1975. Pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
  9. Leyland, M., Robbins, T. W., &Iversen, S. D. Locomotor activity and exploration: The use of traditional manipulators to dissociate these two behaviors in the rat.Animal Learnine & Behavior, 1976,4, 261–265.Google Scholar
  10. Lore, R. K., &Levowitz, A. Differential rearing and free versus forced exploration.Psychonomic Science, 1966,5, 421–422Google Scholar
  11. Luchins, A. S., &Forgus, R. H. The effects of differential post-weaning environment on the rigidity of an animal’s behavior.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1955,86, 51–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mandell, A. J., Segal, D. S., Kuczenski, R. T., &Knapp, S. Amphetamine-induced changes in the regulation of neurotransmitter biosynthetic and receptor functions in the brain. In:Pharmacology and the future of man, Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Pharmacology, San Francisco 1972. Basel: Karger, 1973. Pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  13. Morgan, M. J. Effects of post-weaning environment on learning in the rat.Animal Behaviour, 1973,21, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robbins, T. W., &Iversen, S. D. A dissociation of the effects of d-amphetamine on locomotor activity and exploration in rats.Psychopharmacologia (Berl.), 1973,28, 155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenzweig, M. R. Effects of environment on development of brain and of behavior. In E. Tobach, L. R. Aronson & E. Shaw (Eds.),The biopsychology of development. New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 303–342.Google Scholar
  16. Sahakian, B. J., Robbins, T. W., Morgan, M. J., &Iversen, S. D. The effects of psychomotor stimulants on stereotypy and locomotor activity in socially-deprived and control rats.Brain Research, 1975,84, 195–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneider, J., &Gross, C. G. Curiosity in the hamster.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,59, 150–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Syme, L. A. Social isolation at weaning: Some effects on two measures of activity.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valzelli, L. The “isolation syndrome” in mice.Psychopharmacologia (Bed.), 1973,31, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Welker, W. I. Free vs. forced exploration of a novel situation by rats.Psychological Reports, 1957,3, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Sahakian
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. W. Robbins
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. D. Iversen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CambridgeCambridgeEngland
  2. 2.Psychological LaboratoryCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations