Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 114–120 | Cite as

Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmarkevents

  • Elizabeth F. Loftus
  • Wesley Marburger
Article

Abstract

When people are questioned about past experiences, it is common for eventsto be reported as happening more recently than they actually did. One technique for reducing the instances of this “forward telescoping” is tested in the current research: It involves the provision of landmark events that can clearly mark the beginning of the reference period. Such atechnique was shown to reduce the telescoping problem in five experiments, involving 1, 694 subjects. The landmark event used in two of the studies was the first major eruption of Mt. St. Helens, and use of this event was shown to significantly reduce the incidence of forward telescoping of crime victimizations. Asking subjects to provide their own personal landmarks had similar beneficial effects. Finally, a more usual public landmark event, New Year’s day, substantially reduced forward telescoping. At least part, but not all, of the benefit of landmark events appears to be due to their being dated rather precisely.

Keywords

Reference Period Memory Strength Absolute Judgment Crime Victimization Temporal Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Reiss, A. J., Jr.Summary for victim reporting of series and nonseries incidents over time (Tech. Rep. 3). New Haven, Conn: Yale University, Analytical Studies in Victimization by Crime, June 1977.Google Scholar

References

  1. Baddeley, A. The limitations of human memory: Implications for the design of retrospective surveys. In L. Moss & H. Goldstein (Eds.),The recall method in social surveys. London: University of London Institute of Education, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, M. L.Psychology and consumer affairs. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Bower, G. Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Hrklsford, J., Freund, R., &Kundus, D. Recency judgments in a short-term memory task.Psychonomic Science, 1967,8, 247–248.Google Scholar
  5. Cannell, C. F., Oskenbero, L., &Converse, J. M. Striving for response accuracy: Experiments in new interviewing techniques.Journal of Marketing Research, 1977,14, 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garofalo, J., &Hindelang, M. J.An introduction to the National Crime Survey. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Justice, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Hinrichs, J. B. A two-process memory strength theory for judgment of recency.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lindsay, P. H., &Norman, D. A.Human information processing: Anintroduction to psychology. NewYork: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. Morton, J. Repeated items and decay in memory.Psychonomic Science, 1968,10, 219–220.Google Scholar
  10. Morton, J. What could possibly be innate? In J. Morton (Ed.),Biological and social aspects of psycholinguistics. London: Logo Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. National Academy Of Sciences.Surveying crime. Report of the panel for the evaluation of crime surveys. Washington, D.C: Author, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Neter, J., &Waksberq, J. A study of response errors in expenditures data from household interview.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1964,59, 18–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sudman, S., &Bradburn, N. M. Effects of time and memory factors on response in surveys.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1973,68, 805–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Teacher Brothers’ modern-day almanac. Philadelphia: Running Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, M. D.Retrieval from very long-term memory. Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation, Universityof California, San Diego, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. Yarrow, M. R., Campbell, J. D., &Burton, R. V. Recollections of childhood: A study of the retrospective method.Society for Research in Child Development Monographs, 1970,5, 1–83.Google Scholar
  17. Yntema, D.B., &Trask, F. P. Recallas a search process.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth F. Loftus
    • 1
  • Wesley Marburger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle

Personalised recommendations