Memory & Cognition

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 531–552 | Cite as

Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research

  • Raymond S. Nickerson


When people are asked to recall words from a list they have just studied or to produce as many items as possible from a well-known category (e.g., states of the United States), having available a subset of the items as cues often does not facilitate retrieval of the remaining items and sometimes inhibits it. The finding has been obtained many times with a variety of experimental tasks including recall from categorized and noncategorized lists and retrieval from very long-term memory. This paper reviews the studies that have yielded the effect, and considers several explanations of it that have been proposed. None of these explanations is viewed to be entirely adequate and compelling.


  1. Allen, M. M. (1969). Cueing and retrieval In free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1972). FRAN: A simulation model of free recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.)The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bahrick, H. P. (1970). Two-phase model for prompted recall.Psychological Review,77, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basden, D. R. (1973). Cued and uncued free recall of unrelated words following interpolated learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 429–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basden, D. R., Basden, B. H., &Galloway, B. C. (1977). Inhibition with part-list cuing: Some tests of the item strength hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,3, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items In 56 categories: A replication and extension for the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (3, Pt. 2.)Google Scholar
  7. Bellezza, F. S., &Hartwell, T. C. (1981). Cuing subjective units.Journal of Psychology,107, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blake, M., &Okada, R. (1973). Intralist cuing following retroactive inhibition of well-learned items.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 386–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates.Journal of General Psychology,49, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bousfield, W. A., &Puff, C. R. (1964). Clustering as a function of response dominance.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 76–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bousfield, W. A., &Sedgewick, C. H. W. (1944). An analysis of sequences of restricted associative responses.Journal of General Psychology,30, 149–165.Google Scholar
  12. Bower, G. H., Clark, M. C., Lesgold, A. M., &Winzenz, D. (1969). Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, A. S. (1981). Inhibition in cued retrieval.Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,7, 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, A. S., &Hall, L. A. (1979). Part-list cuing inhibition in semantic memory structures.American Journal of Psychology,92, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, J. (1968). Reciprocal facilitation and impairment in free recall.Psychonomic Science,10, 41–42.Google Scholar
  16. Cofer, C. N. (1965). On some factors in the organizational characteristics of free recall.American Psychologist,20, 261–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, B. H. (1963). Recall of categorized word lists.Journal of experimental Psychology,66, 227–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Deese, J. (1959). Influence of inter-item associative strength upon immediate free recall.Psychological Reports,5, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deese, J. (1961). From the isolated verbal unit to connected discource. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.)Verbal learning and verbal behavior. New York: McGraw-Hili.Google Scholar
  20. Dong,T. (1972). Cued partial recall of categorized words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dong, T., &Kintsch, W. (1968). Subjective retrieval cues in free-recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,7, 813–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Epstein, W. (1969). Post-stimulus output specification and differential retrieval from short-term memoryJournal of Experimental Psychology,82, 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein, W. (1970). Facilitation of retrieval resulting from post-input exclusion of part of the input.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, DC: Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Glanzer, M. &Schwartz, A. (1971). Mnemonic structure in free recall: Differential effects on STS and LTS.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,10, 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hastie, R. (1975). Intra1ist repetition in free recall: Effects of frequency attribute recall instructions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,104, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson, R. L. &Austin, J. B. (1970). Effect of context and category name on the recall of categorized word lists.Journal of experimental Psychology,86, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hudson, R. L., &Davis, J. L. (1972). The effect of intralist cues, extralist cues, and category names on categorized recall.Psychonomic Science,29, 71–75.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins, J. J., Mink, W. D., &Russell, W. A. (1958). Associative clustering as a function of verbal association strength.Psychological Reports,4, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins, J. J., &Russell, W. A. (1952). Associative clustering during recall.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,47, 818–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, N. F. (1970). The role of chunking and organization in the process of recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Karchmer, N. A., &Winograd, E. (1971). The effects of studying a subset of familiar items on recall of the remaining Items: The John Brown effect.Psychonomic Science,25, 224–225.Google Scholar
  33. Kintsch, W. (1970). Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lauer, P. A. (1974). Encoding specificity in the cued and free recall of categorically and alphabetically organized words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,4, 496–498.Google Scholar
  35. Lauer, P. A., &Battig, W. F. (1972). Free recall of taxonomically and alphabetically organized word lists as a function of storage and retrieval cues.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, M. Q. (1971). Categorized lists and cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, M. Q. (1974). Cue effectiveness in cued recall.Journal of experimental Psychology,102, 737–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luek, S. P., Mclaughlin, J. P., &Cicala, G. A. (1971). Effects of blocking of input and blocking of retrieval cues on free recall learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 159–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mandler, G. (1967). Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.)The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. I, pp 327-372). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Marshall, G. R. (1967). Stimulus characteristics contributing to organization in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,6, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mathews, R. C., &Tulving, E. (1973). Effects of three types of repetition on cued and noncued recall of words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 707–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mueller, C. W., &Watkins, M. J. (1977). Inhibition from part-set cuing: A cue-overload interpretation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,16, 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murdock, B. B. (1960). The immediate retention of unrelated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,60, 222–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Neely, J. H., Schmidt, S. R., &Roediger, H. L. III. (1983). Inhibition from related primes in recognition memory.Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,9, 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nelson, D. L., &Mclivov, C. L. (1979a). Effects of retention interval and modality on sensory and semantic trace informationMemory & Cognition,7, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson, D. L., &Mcevoy, C. L. (1979b). Encoding context and set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,5, 292–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nelson, D. L., Mcevoy, C. L., &Friedrich, M. A. (1982). Extra1ist cuing and retrieval inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,8, 90–105.Google Scholar
  48. Nickerson, R. S., Smith, E. E., & Wallach, R. W. (1984).Memory search of semantic categories following exposure to category instances. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  49. Parker, R. E., &Warren, L. (1974). Partial category cuing: The accessibility of categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 1123–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pollio, H. R., &Gerow, J. R. (1968). The role of rules in recall.American Journal of Psychology,81, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raaljmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reardon, E., Polzella, D., &Brown, T. W. (1975). Re-examination of traced storage in free recall.Perceptual and Motor Skills,41, 383–392.Google Scholar
  53. Robbins, D., Bray, J. F., &Irvin, J. R. (1974). Intralist contrast effects in cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roberts, W. A. (1972). Free recall of word lists varying in length and rate of presentation: A test of the total time hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roediger, H. L., III.(1973).Inhibition in recall from cueing with recall targetsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 644–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roediger, H. L., III. (1974) Inhibiting effects of recall.Memory & Cognition,2, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roediger, H. L., III.(1978). Recall as a self-limiting process.Memory & Cognition,6, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roediger, H. L., III,Neely, J. H., &Blaxton, T. A. (1983). Inhibition from related primes in semantic memory retrieval: A reappraisal of Brown’s (1979) paradigmJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition,9, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roediger, H. L., III, &Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,6, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roediger, H. L., III,Stellon, C. C., &Tulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,3, 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. {au{fnRoediger}, {gnH. L.}}, III, & {au{fnTulving}, {gnE.}} ({dy1974}, May). {jtPart list cuing and directed forgetting}. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  62. Roediger, H. L., III, &Tulving, E. (1979). Exclusion of material from recall as a post retrieval operation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18, 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rundus, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Segal, M. A., &Mandler, G. (1967). Directionality and organization processes in paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,74, 305–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Shiffrin, R. M. (1970). Memory search. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Slamecka, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 504–513.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Slamecka, N. J. (1969). Testing for associative storage in multitrial free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Slamecka, N. J. (1972). The question of associative growth in the learning of categorized materials,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Slamecka, N. J. (1975). Intralist cueing of recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,14, 630–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, A. D. (1971). Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,10, 400–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, A. D. (1973). Input order and output interference in organized recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith, A. D., D’agostlno, P. R., &Reid, L. (1970). Output interference in long-term memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,24, 85–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Todres, A. K., &Watkins, M. J. (1981). A part-set cuing effect in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and memory,7, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tulving, E. (1964). Intratrial and intertrial retention: Notes towards a theory of free recall verbal learning.Psychological Review,71, 219–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Tulving, E. (1968). Theoretical issues in free recall. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.)Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  76. Tulving, E., &Arbuckle, T. Y. (1963). Sources of intratrial interference in paired-associate learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1, 321–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tulving, E., &Hastie, R. (1972). Inhibition effects of intralist repetition in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tulving, E., &Madigan, S. A. (1970). Memory and verbal learning.Annual Review of Psychology,21, 437–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versusaccessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,5, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tulving, E., &Psotka, J. (1971). Retroactive inhibition in free recall inaccessibility of information available in the memory store.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Watkins, M. J. (1975). Inhibition in recall with extralist “cues.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,14, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waugh, N. C. (1963). Immediate memory as a function of repetition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,2, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wickelgren, W. A. (1976). Network strength theory of storage and retrieval dynamics.Psychological Review,83, 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wood, D. (1969). Retrieval cues and the accessibility of higher-order memory units in multi trial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8, 782–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond S. Nickerson
    • 1
  1. 1.Bolt Beranek and Newman IncCambridge

Personalised recommendations