Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 647–653 | Cite as

Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces

Brief Reports
  • 1.6k Downloads

Abstract

We examined figural aftereffects in images of human faces, for which changes in configuration are highly discriminable. Observers either matched or rated faces before or after viewing distorted images of faces. Prior adaptation strongly biases face perception by causing the original face to appear distorted in a direction opposite to the adapting distortion. Aftereffects transferred across different faces and were similar for upright or inverted faces, but were weaker when the adapting and test faces had different orientations (e.g., adapt inverted and test upright). Thus the aftereffects depend on which images are distorted, and not simply on the type of distortion introduced. We further show that the aftereffects are asymmetric, for adapting to the original face has little effect on the perception of a distorted face. This asymmetry suggests that adaptation may play an important normalizing role in face perception. Our results suggest that in normal viewing, figural aftereffects may strongly influence form perception and could provide a novel method for probing properties of human face perception.

References

  1. Addams, J. (1834). An account of a peculiar optical phaenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body, etc.London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine & Journal of Science,5, 373–374.Google Scholar
  2. Atick, J. J., Griffin, P. A., &Redlich, A. N. (1996). The vocabulary of shape: Principal shapes for probing perception and neural response.Network: Computation in Neural Systems,7, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, H. B. (1990). A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects. In C. Blakemore (Ed.),Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 363–375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blakemore, C., &Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: A new aftereffect.Science,166, 245–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Damasio, A. R. (1985). Prosopagnosia.Trends in Neurosciences,8, 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desimone, R. (1991). Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., &Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms.Vision Research,35, 2089–2093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Galper, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative.Psychonomic Science,19, 207–208.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines.Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J., &Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., &Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.Journal of Neuroscience,17, 4302–4311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Köhler, W., &Wallach, H. (1944). Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,88, 269–357.Google Scholar
  14. Logothetis, N. K., &Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition.Annual Review of Neuroscience,19, 577–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsumoto, D., &Ekman, P. (1988).Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE) and neutral faces (JACNeuf ). San Francisco: San Francisco State University, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  16. Osgood, C. E., &Heyer, A. W. (1952). A new interpretation of figural after-effects.Psychological Review,59, 98–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., &Chitty, A. J. (1987). Visual neurones responsive to faces.Trends in Neurosciences,10, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.Perception,17, 43–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rolls, E. T., &Baylis, G. C. (1986). Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey.Experimental Brain Research,65, 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., &MacDonald, B. (1992). Functional anatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission topography study.Brain,115, 15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanaka, J. R., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 225–245.Google Scholar
  22. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion.Perception,9, 483–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,79, 471–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. von Békésy, G. (1960).Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Webster, M. A. (1996). Human colour perception and its adaptation.Network: Computation in Neural Systems,7, 587–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Webster, M. A., &Miyahara, E. (1997). Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,14, 2355–2366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Webster, M. A., &Mollon, J. D. (1994). The influence of contrast adaptation on color appearance.Vision Research,34, 1993–2020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Webster, M. A., &Mollon, J. D. (1997). Adaptation and the color statistics of natural images.Vision Research,37, 3283–3298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the after-effect of seen movement.British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, No. 1, 1–117.Google Scholar
  30. Yin, K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology/296University of NevadaReno

Personalised recommendations