Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 225–240 | Cite as

Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model

  • Charles W. Eriksen
  • James D. St. James
Article

Abstract

The operation of attention in the visual field has often been compared to a spotlight. We propose that a more apt analogy is that of a zoom or variable-power lens. Two experiments focused upon the following questions: (1) Can the spatial extent of the attentional focus be made to vary in response to precues? (2) As the area of the attentional focus increases, is there a decrease in processing efficiency for stimuli within the focus? (3) Is the boundary of the focus sharply demarked from the residual field, or does it show a gradual dropoff in processing resources? Subjects were required to search eight-letter circular displays for one of two target letters and reaction times were recorded. One to four adjacent display positions were precued by underlines at various stimulus onset asynchronies before display presentation. A response competition paradigm was used, in which the “other target” was used as a noise letter in noncued as well as cued locations. The results were in good agreement with the zoom lens model.

Supplementary material

Ferrand-BRM-2008.zip (107 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 340 KB.

References

  1. Beck, J., &Ambler, B. (1973). The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Colegate, R., Hoffman, J. E., &Eriksen, C. W. (1973). Selective encoding from multielement visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 529–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DiLollo, V. (1977). Temporal characteristics of iconic memory.Nature,267, 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation,11, 277–320.Google Scholar
  6. Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksen, C. W., &Colegate, R. L. (1970). Selective attention and serial processing in briefly presented visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksen, C. W., &Collins, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 254–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eriksen, C. W., &Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing?Perception & Psychophysics,26, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective coding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1974). Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,4, 587–589.Google Scholar
  13. Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention.The American Journal of Psychology,83, 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksen, C. W., &Spencer, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph,79(2, Pt. 2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Schafer, C. (1982). Development of associative and perceptual interference.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman, J. E. (1975). Hierarchical stages in the processing of visual information.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffman, J. E. (1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
  22. Jonides, J. (1980). Toward a model of the mind’s eye.Canadian Journal of Psychology,34, 103–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind’s eye’s movement.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 247–250.Google Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Keren, G., &Skelton, J. (1976). On selecting between theories of selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 85–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinchla, R. A. (1974). Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laberge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters in words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lappin, J. S., &Uttal, W. R. (1976). Does prior knowledge facilitate the detection of visual targets in random noise?Perception & Psychophysics,20, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Posner, M. I., Snyder, R. R., &Davidson, D. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prinzmetal, W., &Banks, W. P. (1983). Perceptual capacity limits in visual detection and search.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 263–266.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 586–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw, M. L., &Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shiffrin, R. M., &Gardner, G. T. (1972). Visual processing capacity and attentional control.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 72–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shiffrin, R. M., &Geisler, W. S. (1973). Visual recognition in a theory of information processing. In R. Solso (Ed.),The Loyola Symposium: Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology. Washington, DC: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
  35. Shiffrin, R. M., McKay, D. P., &Shaffer, W. D. (1976). Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skelton, J. M., &Eriksen, C. W. (1976). Spatial characteristics of selective attention in letter matching.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,7, 136–138.Google Scholar
  37. Wickens, C. D. (1978). The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking.Journal of Experimental Psychology,105, 1–17.Google Scholar
  38. Yeh, Y., &Eriksen, C. W. (1984). Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Eriksen
    • 1
  • James D. St. James
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IllinoisChampaign

Personalised recommendations