Memory & Cognition

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 651–658 | Cite as

Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering

  • Arthur M. Glenberg
  • Jennifer L. Schroeder
  • David A. Robertson
Article

Abstract

When people are asked moderately difficult questions, they often avert their gazes. We report five experiments in which we documented this phenomenon. They demonstrate that (1) the frequency of gaze aversion is related to the difficulty of cognitive processing, (2) this behavior cannot be due solely to demand characteristics or embarrassment, and (3) the behavior is functional: Averting the gaze improves performance. We speculate that averting the gaze helps people to disengage from environmental stimulation and thereby enhances the efficiency of cognitive processing directed by nonenvironmental stimulation.

References

  1. Argyle, M., &Kendon, A. (1967). Experimental analysis of social performance. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 55–98). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., &Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 723–767.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,22, 349–368.Google Scholar
  4. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Day, M. E. (1964). An eye movement phenomenon relating to attention, thought and anxiety.Perceptual & Motor Skills,19, 443–446.Google Scholar
  6. De Gennaro, L., &Violani, C. (1988). Reflective lateral eye movements: Individual styles, cognitive and lateralization effects.Neuropsychologia,26, 727–736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrlichman, H. (1981). From gaze aversion to eye-movement suppression: An investigation of the cognitive interference explanation of gaze patterns during conversation.British Journal of Social Psychology,20, 233–241.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrlichman, H., &Weinberger, A. (1978). Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin,85, 1080–1101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, R. P., &Geiselman, R. E. (1992).Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield IL: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  10. Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., &Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 375–399.Google Scholar
  11. Gärdenfors, P. (1996). Cued and detached representations in animal cognition.Behavioral Processes,36, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,20, 1–19.Google Scholar
  13. Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness account of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction.Acta Psychologica,26, 22–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kinsbourne, M. (1972). Eye and head turning indicates cerebral lateralization.Science,176, 539–541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinsbourne, M. (1974). Direction of gaze and distribution of cerebral thought processes.Neuropsychologia,12, 279–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kundera, M. (1996).Slowness. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  18. LeCompte, D. (1994). Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1396–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meskin, B. B., &Singer, J. L. (1974). Daydreaming, reflective thought, and laterality of eye movements.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,30, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Modigliani, V., &Hedges, D. G. (1987). Distributed rehearsal and the primacy effect in single-trial free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 338–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reder, L. M., &Ritter, E. F. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richardson, A. (1978). Subject, task, and tester variables associated with initial eye movement responses.Journal of Mental Imagery,2, 85–100.Google Scholar
  24. Roediger, H. L., III,Guynn, M. J., &Jones, T. C. (1994). Implicit memory: A tutorial review. In G. d’Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.)International perspectives on psychological science: The state of the art (Vol. 2, pp. 67–94). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, B. L., &Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhance feeling-of-knowing judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1074–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur M. Glenberg
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Schroeder
    • 1
  • David A. Robertson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WisconsinMadison

Personalised recommendations