Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 161–168 | Cite as

On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time

  • Stan C. A. M. Gielen
  • Richard A. Schmidt
  • Pieter J. M. Van Den Heuvel


Two experiments examined the RT to visual stimuli presented alone and when either auditory (Experiment 1) or kinesthetic (Experiment 2) stimuli followed the visual event by 50 or 65 msec, respectively. As has been found before, the RT to combined stimulus events was 20 to 40 msec shorter than to visual events alone. While such results have generally been interpreted to mean that two sensory modalities are interacting, Raab’s (1962) hypothesis of statistical facilitation— that the subject responds to that stimulus modality whose processing is completed first—is also possible. Using Raab’s model, but with relaxed assumptions, the present experiments show that RT to combined stimulus events is more rapid than can be accounted for by statistical facilitation. Therefore, some intersensory interaction was probably occurring. The nature of these possible interactions and the status of the statistical-facilitation hypothesis are discussed. Supported in part by Grant BNS 80–23125 from the National Science Foundation to the second author.


Choice Reaction Time Catch Trial Stimulus Modality Imperative Stimulus Statistical Facilitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Erkelens, C. Unpublished data,Faculty of Dentistry, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt, R. A., Gielen, S. C. A. M., & van den Heuvel, P. J. M.On the locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Manuscript submitted for publication May 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gielen, S. C. A. M., Schmidt, R. A., & van den Heuvel, P. J. M. Unpublished experiments, Department of Physiological and Medical Physics, Rijksuniversiteit, Utrecht, 1981.Google Scholar


  1. Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M. H., &Edelstein, B. A. Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 1969,80, 567–569. (a)Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M. H., &Edelstein, B. A. Intermodal effects in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 405–407. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein, I. H., &Edelstein, B. A. Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,87, 241–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chernikoff, R., &Taylor, F. V. Reaction time to kinesthetic stimulation resulting from sudden arm displacement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952,43, 1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurfinkel, V. S., &Pal’tsev, Y. I. Effect of the state of the spinal cord on the execution of a simple motor reaction.Biophysics, 1965,10, 944–951.Google Scholar
  6. Hershesson, M. Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Michie, P. T., Clarke, A. M., Sinden, J. D., &Glue, L. C. T. Reaction time and spinal excitability in a simple reaction time task.Physiology & Behavior, 1976,16, 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morrell, L. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time.Psychonomic Science, 1967,8, 77–78.Google Scholar
  9. Morrell, L. K. Cross-modality effects upon choice reaction time.Psychonomic Science, 1968,11, 129–130. (a)Google Scholar
  10. Morrell, L. K. Temporal characteristics of sensory integration in choice reaction times.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 14–18. (b)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nickerson, R. S. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement?Psychological Review, 1973,80, 489–509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Posner, M. I.Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, N.J: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. Visual dominance. An information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 157–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Raab, D. H. Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1962,24, 574–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt, R. A.Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. Schneider, W., &Fiske, A. D. Attention theory and mechanisms for skilled performance. In R. A. Magill (Ed.),Memory and control of motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
  17. Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Semjen, A., Bonnet, M., &Requin, J. Relationship between the time-course of Hoffman reflexes and the foreperiod duration in a reaction-time task.Physiology & Behavior, 1973,10, 1041–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 11. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simon, J. R., &Craft, J. L. Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 272–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Todd, J. W. Reaction time to multiple stimuli.Archives of Psychology, 1912,3, 1–65.Google Scholar
  22. Wadman, W. J., Boerhout, W., &Denier Van Den Gon, J. J. Responses of the arm movement control system to force impulses.Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1980,6, 280–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stan C. A. M. Gielen
    • 1
  • Richard A. Schmidt
    • 2
  • Pieter J. M. Van Den Heuvel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiological and Medical Physics at Rijksuniversiteit UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology at UCLAUSA

Personalised recommendations