Memory & Cognition

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 838–848 | Cite as

False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories

  • Kenneth A. Norman
  • Daniel L. Schacter


Roediger and McDermott (1995) demonstrated that when subjects hear a list of associates to a “theme word” that has itself not been presented, they frequently claim to recollect having heard the nonpresented theme word on the study list. In Experiment 1, we found that asking subjects to explain theirremember responses, by writing down exactly what they remembered about the item’s presentation at study, did not significantly diminish the rate ofremember false alarms to nonpresented theme words. We also found that older adults were relatively more susceptible than younger adults to this false-recognition effect. Subjects’ explanations suggested that both veridical and illusory memories were predominantly composed of associative information as opposed to sensory and contextual detail. In Experiment 2, we obtained quantitative evidence for this conclusion, using a paradigm in which subjects were asked focused questions about the contents of their recollective experience. Lastly, we found that both younger and older adults recalled more sensory and contextual detail in conjunction with studied items than with nonpresented theme words, although these differences were less pronounced in older adults.


False Alarm Target Word Elderly Subject Recognition Test Item Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, J. C., Strater, L., &Fulton, A. (1991). False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.Memory & Cognition,19, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology,2, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, G., &Faulkner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and eyewitness testimony.Psychology & Aging,4, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodson, C. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1993). Rate of false source attributions depends on how questions are asked.American Journal of Psychology,106, 541–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dywan, J., &Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame.Psychology & Aging,5, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,16, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garry, M., Manning, C., Loftus, E. F., &Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 208–214.Google Scholar
  11. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., &Chrosniak, L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events.Psychology & Aging,5, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., Vnek, N., &Ferguson, S. A. (1994). Aging and the effects of affective and factual focus on source monitoring and recall.Psychology & Aging,9, 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyman, I. E., Husband, T. H., &Billings, F. J. (1995). False memories of childhood experiences.Applied Cognitive Psychology,9, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, M. A., &Kim, J. K. (1982). Pictures and images: Spatial and temporal information compared.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,19, 23–26.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. Y., &Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Jones, C., Brown, G. H., Houle, S., &Tulving, E. (1995). Functional roles of prefrontal cortex in retrieval of memories: A PET study.NeuroReport,6, 1880–1884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindsay, D. S., &Johnson, M. K. (1989). Eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source.Memory & Cognition,17, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loftus, E. F., &Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories.Psychiatric Annals,25, 720–725.Google Scholar
  23. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., & Johnson, M. K. (in press). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.Memory & Cognition.Google Scholar
  24. Mosovitch, M. (1995). Confabulation. In D. L. Schacter, J. T. Coyle, G. D. Fischbach, M.-M. Mesulam, & L. E. Sullivan (Eds.),Memory distortion: How minds, brains, and societies reconstruct the past (pp. 226–291). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moscovitch, M., &Winocur, G. (1995). Frontal lobes, memory, and aging. In J. Grafman, K. J. Holyoak, & F. Boller (Eds.), Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 769, pp. 119–150). New York: New Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  26. Nyberg, L., Cabeza, R., &Tulving, E. (1996). PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 135–148.Google Scholar
  27. Nyberg, L., McIntosh, A. R., Houle, S., Nilsson, L.-G., &Tulving, E. (1996). Activation of medial temporal structures during episodic memory retrieval.Nature,380, 715–717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., &Frackowiack, R. S. J. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory.Nature,362, 342–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.Google Scholar
  30. Rankin, J. S., &Kausler, D. H. (1979). Adult age differences in false recognitions.Journal of Gerontology,34, 58–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Read, J. D. (1996). From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 105–111.Google Scholar
  32. Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Memory illusions.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell, W. A., & Jenkins, J. J. (1954).The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test (Tech. Rep. No. 11, Contract N8 ONR 66216, Office of Naval Research). University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  35. Schacter, D. L. (1995). Memory distortion: History and current status. In D. L. Schacter, J. T. Coyle, G. D. Fischbach, M.-M. Mesulam, & L. E. Sullivan (Eds.),Memory distortion: How minds, brains and societies reconstruct the past (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schacter, D. L. (1996).Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Schacter, D. L., Alpert, N. M., Savage, C. R., Rauch, S. L., &Albert, M. S. (1996). Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: Evidence from positron emission tomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,93, 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schacter, D. L., Curran, T., Galluccio, L., Milberg, W., &Bates, J. (1996). False recognition and the right frontal lobe: A case study.Neuropsychologia,34, 793–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schacter, D. L., Reiman, E., Curran, T., Yun, L. S., Bandy, D., Mc-Dermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Neuroanatomical correlates of veridical and illusory recognition memory revealed by PET.Neuron,17, 267–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schacter, D. L., Reiman, E., Uecker, A., Polster, M. R., Yun, L. S., &Cooper, L. A. (1995). Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information.Nature,376, 587–590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schacter, D. L., Savage, C. R., Alpert, N. M., Rauch, S. L., &Albert, M. S. (1996). The role of hippocampus and frontal cortex in agerelated memory changes: A PET study.NeuroReport,7,1165–1169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., &Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shimamura, A. P. (1995). Memory and frontal lobe function. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 803–813). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Squire, L. R., Ojemann, J. G., Miezin, F. M., Petersen, S. E., Videen, T. O., &Raichle, M. E. (1992). Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: A functional anatomical study of memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,89, 1837–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stuss, D. T., Eskes, G. A., &Foster, J. K. (1994). Experimental neuropsychological studies of frontal lobe functions. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 9, pp. 149–185). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  47. Sulin, R. A., &Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in the retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.Google Scholar
  49. Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., Blanchard, L., & Rosen, M. (1996, April).Older adults show greater false recognition effects than young adults. Paper presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  50. Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., & Rosen, M. J. (1995, November).Age effects on false memory for words. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  51. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zaragoza, M. S., &Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 934–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Norman
    • 1
  • Daniel L. Schacter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations