Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 111–116 | Cite as

Fluent and nonfluent forms of transfer in reading: Words and their message

Brief Reports


In two experiments, we examined transfer to the reading of a normal text from a prior reading of that intact text or from a prior reading of a scrambled word version of the passage. In Experiment 1, we studied good and poor readers in Grade 4; in Experiment 2, high- and low-ability undergraduate readers. Good readers at both ages showed rereading benefits only when the prior reading was of the intact text, with no reliable benefit from experience with words only. The poorer readers showed reliable rereading benefits even when only the words, in a scrambled order, were read on the first encounter. The results are discussed in terms of two forms of transfer: nonfluent reading transfer when attention must be focused on word recognition, and fluent rereading transfer when word recognition is skilled so that attention can be focused on text processing.


Word Recognition Reading Time Poor Reader Good Reader Transfer Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Carlson, L. A., Alejano, A. R., &Carr, T. H. (1991). The level-of-focal-attention hypothesis in oral reading: Influences of strategies on the context specificity of lexical repetition effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 924–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, T. H., Brown, J. S., &Charalambous, A. (1989). Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 763–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, N. J., &Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that.Science,210, 207–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahl, P. R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In J. E. Button, T. C. Lovitt, & T. D. Rowland (Eds.),Communications research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33–65). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers’ fluency and comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly,22, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faulkner, H. J., &Levy, B. A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,58, 1–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Flesch, R. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology,32, 221–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolers, P. A. (1975). Memorial consequences of automatized encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,1, 689–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levy, B. A. (1993). Fluent rereading: An indirect indicator of reading skill development. In P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.),Indirect memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 49–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Levy, B. A., &Burns, K. I. (1990). Reprocessing text: Contributions from top-down processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology,6, 293–323.Google Scholar
  11. Levy, B. A., Campsall, J., Browne, J., Cooper, D., Waterhouse, C., &Wilson, C. (1995). Reading fluency: Episodic integration across texts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1169–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levy, B. A., &Kirsner, K. (1989). Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levy, B. A., Masson, M. E. J., &Zoubek, M. A. (1991). Rereading text: Words and their context.Canadian Journal of Psychology,45, 492–506.Google Scholar
  14. Oliphant, G. W. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition.Australian Journal of Psychology,35, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rashotte, C. A., &Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children.Reading Research Quarterly,20, 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings.The Reading Teacher,32, 403–408.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations