Virtual subjects: Using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment

Article

Abstract

This paper presents a rationale for why some researchers might consider using the Internet for research by addressing four issues. First, a few unique research opportunities afforded by the Internet are discussed. Second, the utility of using newsgroups and theTelnet protocol is described. Third, Internet research ethical guidelines in five areas are developed. Fourth, the data validity issue is addressed, and previous research using Internet and introductory psychology subject samples is replicated. The samples were similar on 5 of 7 demographic variables but differed in age and sex compositions, and response patterns for the two samples were similar to those reported previously . Finally, some limitations of the Internet are considered, as are its potentials to fulfill traditional research requirements and its use as an educational aid.

References

  1. Biggar, R. J., &Melbye, M. (1992). Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: A method to examine potential biases.American Journal of Public Health,82, 1506–1512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordia, P. (1996). Studying verbal interaction on the Internet: The case of rumor transmission research.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 149–151.Google Scholar
  3. Bowden, R. J. (1986). Self-selection biases in correlational studies based on questionnaires.Psychometrika,51, 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1991). Computers and computing in psychology: Twenty years of progress and still a bright future.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,23, 106–108.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, B. J., &Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasies: An evolutionary psychological approach.Journal of Sex Research,27, 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esposito, J., Agard, E., &Rosnow, R. (1984). Can confidentiality of data pay off?Personality & Individual Differences,5, 744–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gosling, J., &McGilton, H. (1995).The Java language environment: A white paper. Sun Microsystems, Inc. Available WWW: http://java.sun.com/whitePaper/java-whitepaper-1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. Harby, A.,Quinlan, M., &Roy, R. (1994).Interactive video conferencing in British Columbia. (Available from the Standing Committee on Educational Technology, c/o Centre for Curriculum & Professional Development, 5th Floor, 1483 Douglas St., Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3K4)Google Scholar
  9. Hewson, C. M., Laurent, D., &Vogel, C. M. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the Internet.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 186–191.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffman, R., &MacDonald, J. (1993). Using HyperCard and Apple events in a network environment: Collecting data from simultaneous experimental sessions.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, á Computers,25, 114–126.Google Scholar
  11. Huff, C. W., &Rosenberg, J. (1989). The on-line voyeur: Promises and pitfalls of observing electronic interaction.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,21, 166–172.Google Scholar
  12. Kershaw, A. (1993).The challenge of the place bound student: A potential model for the delivery of post-secondary education in the UCC region and beyond. Unpublished manuscript, University College of the Cariboo, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Kershaw, A. (1995, January).Distance delivery technologies: Learning models and optimum applications. Paper presented to the British Columbia Interactive Video User’s group, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  14. Kieley, J. M. (1993). Integrating remotely accessible information services into psychology instruction and research.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 287–294.Google Scholar
  15. Kieley, J. M. (1996). CGI scripts: Gateways to World-Wide Web power.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 165–169.Google Scholar
  16. Krol, E. (1992).The whole Internet. Sebastapol, CA: O’Reilly & Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Lesgold, A. (1991). Research methodology in the postinformatic age.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,23, 109–111.Google Scholar
  18. Markwood, R. A. (1994). Computer tools for distance education. In B. Willis (Ed.),Distance education: Strategies and tools (pp. 199–211). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Mason, R. (1993). Computer conferencing and the new Europe. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.),Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 199–220). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Polson, P. G., Miller, J. R., &Karat, J. (1981). Psychological experimentation through direct connection of the subject interface to a VAX.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,13, 189–191.Google Scholar
  21. Reid, B. (1994, July).Usenet readership summary report. Network Measurement Project at the DEC Network Systems Laboratory in Palo Alto. Available Usenet: news.listsGoogle Scholar
  22. Vokey, J. R., &Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of knowledge in learning artificial grammars.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 328–344.Google Scholar
  23. Yost, M., &Bremner, F. (1985). The use of computer networks in data gathering and data analysis.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,17, 157–159.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College of the CaribooKamloopsCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations