Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 101–105 | Cite as

Pupillary responses in a pitch-discrimination task

  • Daniel Hahnemann
  • Jackson Beatty


Pupils were measured while observers made pitch judgments under the method of constant stimuli. A substantial dilation occurs immediately after the presentation of the comparison tone, and the size of this response is closely correlated to the difficulty of the discrimination. Baseline changes occur within each block of trials, but have little effect on the magnitude of dilations. Responses to redundant stimuli, including the standard itself, decrease during the experimental session. The results support the validity of pupillary measurements as an index of processing load.


  1. Beatty, J.,&Kahneman, D. Pupillary changes in two memory tasks.Psychon. Sci., 1966, 5, 371–372.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J., &Walter, W. G. The interaction of responses in the brain to semantic stimuli.Psychophysiology, 1966, 2, 187–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, H. Enhancement of evoked cortical potentials in humans related to a task requiring a decision.Science, 1964, 144, 182–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haider, M., Spong, P., &Lindsley, D. B. Attention, vigilance, and cortical evoked-potentials in humans.Science, 1964, 144, 180–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hess, E. H., &Polt, J. M. Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli.Science, 1960, 132, 349–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hess, E. H., &Polt, J. M. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving.Science, 1964, 143, 1190–1192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hess, E. H., &Polt, J. M. Changes in pupil size as a measure of taste difference.Percept, mot. Skills, 1966, 23, 451–455.Google Scholar
  8. Hess, E. H., Seltzer, A. L., &Shlien, J. M. Pupil response cf hetero- and homosexual males to pictures of men and women: A pilot study.J. abnorm. Psychol., 1965, 70, 165–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahneman, D., &Beatty, J. Pupil diameter and load on memory.Science, 1966, 154, 1583–1585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lacey, J. I., Kagan, J., Lacey, B. C., &Moss, H. A. The visceral level: Situational determinants and behavioral correlates of autonomie response patterns. In P. H. Knapp (Ed.),Expression of the emotions in man. New York: International Universities Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Obrist, P. A. Cardiovascular differentiation of sensory stimuli.Psychosom. Med., 1963, 6, 450–459.Google Scholar
  12. Paivio, A., &Simpson, H. M. The effect of word abstractness and pleasantness on pupil size during an imagery test.Psychon. Sci., 1966, 5, 55–56.Google Scholar
  13. Sokolov, E. N. Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex.Ann. Rev. Physiol, 1963, 25, 545–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stevens, S. S. Problems and methods of psychophysics.Psychol. Bull., 1958, 54, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., &John, E. R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.Science, 1965, 150, 1187–1188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Walter, W. G. Slow potential waves in the human brain associated with expectancy, attention and decision.Arch. Psychiat. Z. ges. Neurol., 1964, 206, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wickelgren, W. A. Consolidation and retroactive interference in short-term recognition memory for pitch.J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 72, 250–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Press 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Hahnemann
    • 1
  • Jackson Beatty
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for cognitive studiesHarvard UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Human Performance CenterUniversity of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations