Memory & Cognition

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 965–976 | Cite as

Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis

  • Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
  • Fergus I. M. Craik
  • Dana Gavrilescu
  • Nicole D. Anderson


Two experiments provide further information on the effects of divided attention (DA) on encoding and retrieval processes. The first experiment examined the effects of decision and motor difficulty of a concurrent reaction time task. A calibration analysis was used in the second experiment to test the hypothesis that shifting attentional emphasis away from encoding to the secondary task reduces the level of processing the to-be-remembered items receive. Overall, the results confirm and extend the conclusions of Craik, Govoni, Naveh-Benjamin, and Anderson (1996) and Naveh-Benjamin, Craik, Guez, and Dori (1998), by pointing to clear differences between encoding and retrieval processes: Encoding is affected by simultaneous task demands, especially those associated with “central” resources involved in conscious decision making, whereas retrieval is obligatory in that it is largely immune to the effects of simultaneous demands. The results of the calibration analysis suggest that one reason for the poorer memory performance as a result of DA at encoding is a qualitative shift to less deep, elaborative strategies.


  1. Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I. M., &Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.Psychology & Aging,13, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. [D.], Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., &Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 518–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabeza, R., &Nyberg, L. (1997). Imaging cognition: An empirical review of PET studies with normal subjects.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,302, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craik, F. I. M., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1998). Encoding and retrieval processes: Similarities and differences. In M. A. Conway, C. Cornoldi, & S. E. Gathercole (Eds.),Theories of memory II (pp. 61–86). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandes, M. A., &Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects both at retrieval and encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,4, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kellogg, R. T., Cocklin, T., &Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1982). Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.American Journal of Psychology,95, 183–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolers, P. A. (1973). Remembering operations.Memory & Cognition,1, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mishkin, M., &Appenzeller, T. (1987, June). The anatomy of memory.Scientific American,256(6), 80–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory.British Journal of Psychology,56, 413–419.Google Scholar
  14. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1990). Coding of temporal order information: An automatic process?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., &Dori, H. (1998). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1091–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Jonides, J. (1986). On the automaticity of frequency coding: Effects of competing task load, encoding strategy, and intention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 378–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nyberg, L., Cabeza, R., &Tulving, E. (1996). PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 135–148.Google Scholar
  19. Nyberg, L., Tulving, E., Habib, R., Nilsson, L.-G., Kapur, S., Houle, S., Cabeza, R., &McIntosh, A. R. (1995). Functional brain maps of retrieval mode and recovery of episodic information.Neuro-Report,7, 249–252.Google Scholar
  20. Squire, L. R., Cohen, N. J., &Nadel, L. (1984). The medial temporal region and memory consolidation: A new hypothesis. In E. Weingartner & E. Parker (Eds.),Memory consolidation (pp. 185–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Wagner, A. D., Poldrack, R. A., Eldridge, L. L., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. M., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Material-specific lateralization of prefrontal activation during episodic encoding and retrieval.NeuroReport,9, 3711–3717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Welford, A. T. (1976).Skilled performance: Perceptual and motor skills. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
    • 1
  • Fergus I. M. Craik
    • 2
  • Dana Gavrilescu
    • 2
  • Nicole D. Anderson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Rotman Research InstituteBaycrest Centre for Geriatric CareTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations