Memory & Cognition

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 923–938 | Cite as

Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity



It is widely hypothesized that separate recollection and familiarity processes contribute to recognition memory. The present research measured event-related brain potentials (ERPs) from 128 head locations to identify patterns of brain activity related to recollection and familiarity. In two experiments, subjects performed a recognition memory task requiring discrimination between previously studied words, similar words that changed plurality between study and test, and new words (following Hintzman & Curran, 1994). The FN400 ERP component (300–500 msec) varied with the familiarity of words (new>studied = similar). The parietal component (400–800 msec) was associated with the recollection of plurality (studied > similar = new). Differences in the timing and spatial topography of the FN400 and parietal effects support the view that familiarity and recollection arise from distinct neurocognitive processes.


  1. Allan, K., &Rugg, M. D. (1997). An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition.Neuropsychologia,35, 387–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, K., Wilding, E. L., &Rugg, M. D. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection.Acta Psychologica,98, 231–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., &Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 235–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand, O., Perin, F., &Pernier, J. (1985). A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neuroscience,62, 462–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besson, M., Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. (1992). An event-related potentials (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effect in sentences.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,4, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., &Kneer, R. (1995). False-recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalfonte, B. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,24, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, S. E., Hori, A., &Callan, D. E. (1993). Forced-choice associative recognition: Implications for global-memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 871–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curran, T. (1999). The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old/new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory.Neuropsychologia,37, 771–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curran, T., &Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curran, T., Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., &Galluccio, L. (1997). False recognition after a right frontal lobe infarction: Memory for general and specific information.Neuropsychologia,35, 1035–1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curran, T., Tucker, D. M., Kutas, M., &Posner, M. I. (1993). Topography of the N400: Brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectation.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dien, J. (1998). Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 34–43.Google Scholar
  17. DiGirolamo, G. J., &Hintzman, D. L. (1997). First impressions are lasting impressions: A primacy effect in memory for repetitions.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 121–124.Google Scholar
  18. Donaldson, D. I., &Rugg, M. D. (1998). Recognition memory for new associations: Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection.Neuropsychologia,36, 377–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dosher, B. A. (1984). Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 541–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., &Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability.Psychophysiology,14, 456–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H.-J., &Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,94, 5973–5978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, D. (1990). Cognitive event-related potential components during continuous recognition.Psychophysiology,27, 136–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition.Memory & Cognition,18, 23–30.Google Scholar
  25. Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1993). Recognising and remembering. In A. F. Collins, M. A. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.),Theories of memory (pp. 163–188). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 114–122.Google Scholar
  27. Gardiner, J. M., &Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 579–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardiner, J. M., Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Ramponi, C. (1998). Limitations of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm: A reply to Hirshman.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graf, P. (1995). Defining the opposition procedure: A reply to Toth, Reingold and Jacoby’s (1995) response to Graf and Komatsu (1994).European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graf, P., &Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution!European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gronlund, S. D., &Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 846–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halgren, E., &Smith, M. E. (1987). Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processes in human memory formation and retrieval.Human Neurobiology,6, 129–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hintzman, D. L., &Caulton, D. A. (1997). Recognition memory and modality judgments: A comparison of retrieval dynamics.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., &Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.Memory & Cognition,26, 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1995). When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.Memory & Cognition,23, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 228–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., &Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hirshman, E., &Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm.Memory & Cognition,25, 345–351.Google Scholar
  45. Humphreys, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user’s guide for the process dissociation procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., &Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jasper, H. A. (1958). The ten-twenty system of the international federation.Electroencepholography & Clinical Neurophysiology,10, 371–375.Google Scholar
  51. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., &Nolde, S. F. (1996). Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring.NeuroReport,7, 2929–2932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson, R. J. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 69–137). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  54. Johnson, R. J. (1995). Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 10, pp. 135–163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  55. Joordens, S., &Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kuçera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science,207, 203–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. (1988). Event-related brain potential studies of language. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 139–187). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  59. Lehman, D., &Skrandies, W. (1985). Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—A review.Progress in Neurobiology,23, 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of eventrelated potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models.Electroencepholography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McClelland, J. L., &Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory.Psychological Review,105, 724–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McElree, B., Dolan, P. O., &Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time-course analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory of the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Noldy-Cullum, N. E., &Stelmack, R. M. (1987). Recognition memory for pictures and words: The effect of incidental and intentional learning on N400.Electroencepholography & Clinical Neurophysiology,40(Suppl.), 350–354.Google Scholar
  66. Nunez, P. L. (1981).Electrical fields of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Paller, K. A., &Kutas, M. (1992). Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support of the distinction between conscious recollection and priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,4, 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., &McIsaac, H. K. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain.Psychological Science,6, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Picton, T.W., Lins, O. G., &Scherg, M. (1995). The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 10, pp. 3–73). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  70. Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Remembering and knowing as states of consciousness during retrieval. In J. D. Cohen & J.W. Scholler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 213–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1989). Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in time course of retrieval.Cognitive Psychology,21, 139–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., &McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 352–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reed, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy tradeoff in recognition memory.Science,181, 574–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Gardiner, J. (1995). Retrieval volition and memorial awareness in stem completion: An empirical analysis.Psychological Research,57, 166–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J., &Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp. 85–158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rotello, C. M., &Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject?Journal of Memory & Language,40, 432–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words.Memory & Cognition,18, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rugg, M. D. (1995). ERP studies of memory. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 132–170). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rugg, M. D., Cox, C. J. C., Doyle, M. C., &Wells, T. (1995). Eventrelated potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words.Neuropsychologia,33, 471–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rugg, M. D., &Doyle, M. C. (1992). Event-related potentials and recognition memory for low- and high-frequency words.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., &Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory.Nature,392, 595–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rugg, M. D., &Nagy, M. E. (1989). Event-related potentials and recognition memory for words.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,72, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Doyle, M. C., Cox, C. J. C., &Patching, G. R. (1996). Event-related potentials and the recollection of associative information.Cognitive Brain Research,4, 297–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., &Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schacter, D. L., Bowers, J., &Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness, and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  88. Senkfor, A. J., &Van Petten, C. (1998). Who said what? An eventrelated potential investigation of source and item memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1005–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model of recognition memory: REM—Retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.Google Scholar
  90. Smith, M. E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith, M. E., &Halgren, E. (1989). Dissociation of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Srinivasan, R., Nunez, P. L., Silberstein, R. B., Tucker, D. M., &Cadusch, P. J. (1996). Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline-Laplacians to estimate cortical potentials.Brain Topography,8, 355–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tendolkar, I., Doyle, M. C., &Rugg, M. D. (1997). An event-related potential study of retroactive interference in memory.NeuroReport,8, 501–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Toth, J. P. (1995). Unintentional influences and opposition: A reply to Graf.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Toth, J. P. (1996). Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 123–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1995). A response to Graf and Komatsu’s (1994) critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., &Fabiani, M. (1997). Item and source memory: Differential age effects revealed by eventrelated potentials.NeuroReport,8, 3373–3378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,87, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tucker, D. M., Liotti, M., Potts, G. F., Russell, G. S., &Posner, M. I. (1994). Spatiotemporal analysis of brain electrical fields.Human Brain Mapping,1, 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., &Mc-Isaac, H. (1991). Fractionating the word repetition effect with eventrelated potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wilding, E. L., Doyle, M. C., &Rugg, M. D. (1995). Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: An event-related potential study.Neuropsychologia,33, 743–767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wilding, E. L., &Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source.Brain,119, 889–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wilding, E. L., &Rugg, M. D. (1997a). Event-related potential and the recognition memory exclusion task.Neuropsychologia,35, 119–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wilding, E. L., &Rugg, M. D. (1997b). An event-related potential study of recognition memory for words spoken aloud or heard.Neuropsychologia,35, 1185–1195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland

Personalised recommendations