Memory & Cognition

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 208–224 | Cite as

Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect

  • Alice J. O’toole
  • Kenneth A. Deffenbacher
  • Dominique Valentin
  • Herve Abdi
Article

Abstract

The other-race effect was examined in a series of experiments and simulations that looked at the relationships among observer ratings of typicality, familiarity, attractiveness, memorability, and the performance variables ofd’ and criterion. Experiment 1 replicated the other-race effect with our Caucasian and Japanese stimuli for both Caucasian and Asian observers. In Experiment 2, we collected ratings from Caucasian observers on the faces used in the recognition task. A Varimax-rotated principal components analysis on the rating and performance data for the Caucasian faces replicated Vokey and Read’s (1992) finding that typicality is composed of two orthogonal components, dissociable via their independent relationships to: (1) attractiveness and familiarity ratings and (2) memorahility ratings. For Japanese faces, however, we fond that typicality was related only to memorahility. Where performance measures were concerned, two additional principal components dominated by criterion and byd’ emerged for Caucasian faces. For the Japanese faces, however, the performance measures ofd’ and criterion merged into a single component that represented a second component of typicality, one orthogonal to thememorability-dominated component. A measure offace representation quality extracted from an autoassociative neural network trained with a majority of Caucasian faces and a minority of Japanese faces was incorporated into the principal components analysis. For both Caucasian and Japanese faces, the neural network measure related both to memorability ratings and to human accuracy measures. Combined, the human data and simulation results indicate that the memorahility component of typicality may be related to small, local, distinctive features, whereas the attractiveness/familiarity component may be more related to the global, shape-based properties of the face.

References

  1. Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., &Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces.Memory & Cognition,12, 219–228.Google Scholar
  2. Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., &Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,15, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce, V. (1988).Recognizing faces. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bruce, V., &Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, M. E., &Carr, W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomk Society,6, 383–384.Google Scholar
  6. Deffenbacher, K. A., &Loftus, E. F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?Law & Human Behavior,6, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feingold, C. A. (1914). The influence of environment on identification of persons and things.Journal of Criminal Law & Police Science,5, 39–51.Google Scholar
  8. Going, M., &Read, J. D. (1974), The effect of uniqueness, sex of subject and sex of photograph on facial recognition.Perceptual & Motor Skills,39, 109–110.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, J. E. (1991).A user’s guide to principal components analysis. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jordan, M. I. (1986). An introduction to linear algebra in parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Vol. I. Foundations (pp. 365–421). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kirby, M., &Sirovich, L. (1990). Application of the Karhunen-Loève procedure for the characterization of human faces.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,12, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kshirsagar, A. M. (1972).Multivariate analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  13. Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., &Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory.5, 212–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Otoole, A. J., &Abdi, H. (1989). Connectionist approaches to visually based feature extraction. In G. Tiberghien (Ed.),Advances in cognitive psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–13). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Otoole, A. J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A., &Bartlett, J. C. (1991). Classifying faces by race and sex using an autoassociative memory trained for recognition. In K. J. Hammond & D. Gentner (Eds.),Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 847–851). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Otoole, A. J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A., &Valentin, D. (1993). Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,10, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Otoole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Abdi, H., &Bartlett, J. C. (1991). Simulating the “other-race” effect as a problem in perceptual learning.Connection Science: Journal of Neural Computing, Artificial Intelligence, & Cognitive Research,3, 163–178.Google Scholar
  18. Otooik A. J. &Ihompson J. L. (1993) An X Windows tool for synthesizing face eigenvectors from eigenvectors Behavior Research Methods,Instruments & Computers25, 41–47Google Scholar
  19. Shahiro P N &Penrod, S D (1986) Meta-analysis of face identification studiesPsychological Bulletin,100, 139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shepherd, J W (1981) Social factors m face recognition In G M Davies H D Fills. & J W Shepherd (Eds)Percening and rememhering fates (pp 55–79) London Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Sirovich L. &Kirby, M (1987) Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human facesJournal of the Optical Society of America A3 519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snodgrass, J G &Corwin, J (1988) Pragirutics of recognition mernory Applications to dementia and amnesiaJournal of Experimental Psychology General,117 34–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Valentine, T &Bruce, V (1986) Recognizing familiar faces The role of distinetaveness and familiarityCanadian Journal of Psychology40, 300–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Valentine, T. &Endo, M (1992) Towards an exemplar model of face processing. The effects of race and distinctiveness.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.44A, 671–703Google Scholar
  25. Valentine, T. &Ferrara, A. (1991) Typicality in categorization, recognition and identification Evidence from face recognitionBritish Journal of Psychology,82, 87–102Google Scholar
  26. Vokey, J R &Read, J D (1988) Typicality, familiarity and the recognition of male and female facesCanadian Journal of Psychology,42, 489–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vokey, J R &Read, J D (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of facesMemory & Cognition.20, 291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice J. O’toole
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Deffenbacher
    • 2
  • Dominique Valentin
    • 1
  • Herve Abdi
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Human Development, GR4 1University of Texas at DallasRichardson
  2. 2.University of NebraskaOmaha

Personalised recommendations