Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 105–109 | Cite as

Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants

  • Peter W. Jusczyk
  • Elizabeth Thompson


In the present study, three aspects of the 2-month-old’s perception of multisyllabic utterances were explored. First, do infants perceive phonetic contrasts occurring either in the initial (Bada-Gada) or medial (Daba-Daga) positions of multisyllabic utterances? Second, are infants more likely to perceive these contrasts in stressed as opposed to unstressed syllables? Third, will infants detect a difference between two stress patterns? Our results indicate the following: (1) Two-month-olds are sensitive to place-of-articulation differences occurring in either the initial or medial positions of multisyllabic stimuli. (2) Whether the contrast occurred between stressed or unstressed syllables had little or no effect on the infant’s ability to detect it. (3) Infants as young as 2-months old respond to differences between stress patterns.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Trehub, S. E.Infants discrimination of multisyllabic stimuli: The role o,f temporal factors. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Houston, Texas, November 21. 1976.Google Scholar


  1. Blasdell, R., &Jensen, P. Stress and word position as determmants of imitation m first-language learners.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1970,13, 193–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, R., &Fraser, C. The acquisition of syntax. In C. N. Corer & B. S. Musgrave (Eds.),Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, F. S., &Mattingly, I. G. A computer-controlled PCM system for the investigation of dichotic speech percepnon.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969,46, 115 (A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eimas, P. D. Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eimas, P. D. Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-1] distinction by young infants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 341–347. (a)Google Scholar
  6. Eimas, P. D. Speech perception in early infancy. In L. B. Cohen & P. Salapatek (Eds.),Infant perception. New York: Academic Press, 1975. (b)Google Scholar
  7. Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. W., &Vigorito, J. Speech perception in infants.Science, 1971,171, 303–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fry, D. B. Experiments in the perception of stress.Language and Speech, 1958,1, 126–152.Google Scholar
  9. Jusczyk, P. W. Perception of syllable-final stop consonants by 2-month-old infants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaplan, E. L. The role of intonation in the acquisition of language. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cornell University, 1969.)Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970,30, 3407B. (University Microfilms No. 69–20, 977)Google Scholar
  11. Kuhl, P. K. Speech perception in early infancy: The acquisition of speech-sound categories. In S. K. Hirsh, D. H. Eldredge, I. J. Hirsh, & S. R. Silverman (Eds.),Hearing and Davis: Essays honoring Hallowell Davis. St. Louis, Mo: Washington University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhl, P. K., &Miller, J. D. Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants.Science, 1975,190, 69–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehiste, I.Suprasegmentals. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Liberman, P. Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1960,32, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McClean, M. D., &Tiffany, W. R. The acoustic parameters of stress in relation to syllable position, speech loudness and rate.Language and Speech, 1973,16, 283–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, C., Morse, P. A., &Dorman, M. F. Cardiac indices of infant speech perception: Orienting and burst discrimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977,29, 533–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, W. R., & Erwn, S. The development of grammar in child language. In U. Bellugi & R. Brown (Eds.), The acquisition of language.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1964,29, 9–35.Google Scholar
  18. Morse, P. A. The discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli in early infancy.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972,14, 477–492.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Morton, J., &Jassem, W. Acoustic correlates of stress.Language and Speech, 1965,8, 159–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
  21. Siqueland, D, E. R., &Delucia, C. A. Visual reinforcement of non-nutritive sucking in human infants.Science, 1969,165, 1144–1146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Spring, D. R., &Dale, P. S. Discrimination of linguistic stress in early infancy.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1977,20, 224–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Trehub, S. E. The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults.Child Development, 1976,47, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter W. Jusczyk
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations